1999
DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1998.1760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of Population Structure at the Time of Toxicant Exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
56
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The sublethal effects on population growth rate after exposure to insecticides are highly influenced by the starting population structure. Because different insect stages/ages may present different susceptibilities to toxicants, it is essential to consider this factor to estimate the population susceptibility [52].…”
Section: Demographic Studies For the Assessment Of Insecticide Subletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sublethal effects on population growth rate after exposure to insecticides are highly influenced by the starting population structure. Because different insect stages/ages may present different susceptibilities to toxicants, it is essential to consider this factor to estimate the population susceptibility [52].…”
Section: Demographic Studies For the Assessment Of Insecticide Subletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this design is not appropriate for determining the mechanistic bases of toxicant-density effects that link individual performance to population dynamics. Starting conditions, such as whether the population is initiated with juveniles, adults, or with a stable age distribution will also influence population development and need to be considered carefully (Stark and Banken 1999). Decisions about sampling frequency and protocol (i.e., harvesting entire replicates or subsampling replicates repeatedly over time) will also have to be made on a case-by-case basis.…”
Section: The Importance Of Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common population-level measure of toxicity is its effect on the popula-tion growth rate (PGR), which can be expressed as the continuous growth rate r per unit time, or by the discrete multiplicative rate, λ, where λ = e r (Hansen et al, 1999;Stark and Danken, 1999;Forbes et al, 2000;Kuhn et al, 2000;Stark and Vargas, 2003;Stark, 2005). Forbes and Calow (1999) concluded that the PGR is a better response variable than individual-level endpoints, such as condition factor or fecundity, since r explicitly integrates individual-level responses to contaminants at the population level.…”
Section: Approaches To Quantifying Toxicity In Aquatic Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%