2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of non-timber forest products in the economic valuation of dry deciduous forests of India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(10 reference statements)
5
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kalu and Rachael (2006) noted that internal processing and sale has a central role in processing. Also, in accordance with other studies, market demand has led to high collection levels of the fruit of the cornelian cherry (Arnold andPerez 2001, Mahapatra andTewari 2005). As stated by other researchers, villagers have neither the market information nor the access to markets necessary to improve their bargaining power with local middlemen and thereby derive higher incomes from the sale of NWFPs (Paumgarten and Shackleton 2009, Kar andJacobson 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Kalu and Rachael (2006) noted that internal processing and sale has a central role in processing. Also, in accordance with other studies, market demand has led to high collection levels of the fruit of the cornelian cherry (Arnold andPerez 2001, Mahapatra andTewari 2005). As stated by other researchers, villagers have neither the market information nor the access to markets necessary to improve their bargaining power with local middlemen and thereby derive higher incomes from the sale of NWFPs (Paumgarten and Shackleton 2009, Kar andJacobson 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Nevertheless, studies on NTFPs commercialization are not directly focused on detailed inventory of collected species, but rather on the ratio between subsistence and commercialization purposes of NTFPs for local households. Less than half of identified NTFPs (46%) were intended solely for the market, which corresponds to other studies from eastern India (Mahapatra and Tewari, 2005) or Bangladesh (Kar and Jacobson, 2012). This could be explained through the lack of income diversification opportunities or land availability, which is continuously diminishing over time due to population pressure particularly in the central areas with larger households.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…plantations play crucial role from both economic and environmental perspective. Photograph Z. Polesny case of small animals, thus any attempts of calculation of economic value would be then less reliable (Mahapatra and Tewari, 2005). Majority of commercialized NTFPs in both study areas were sold via middleman, particularly animals.…”
Section: Photomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical data on NTFP values at the national level are usually incomplete and not comparable between countries (Agea et al 2011;Croitoru, 2007). There is little information on NTFP traded in the rural markets and the only focus has been on products traded in formal markets (Mahapatra & Tewari, 2005). Studies have concentrated on products procured for export markets (Claudio, 2005) but this may not be important in terms of contribution to the rural income and employment of local people living adjacent to forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%