Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V 2018
DOI: 10.1061/9780784481462.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of Implied Strength Correction for 1D Site Response at Shallow Sites at a Moderate to Low Seismicity Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The General Quadratic/Hyperbolic (GQ/H) model of Groholski et al (2016) implemented in DEEPSOIL v7 (Hashash et al, 2017) was used to apply the strength correction, which was reported to be important even for shallow deposits in regions of moderate to low seismicity (Aaqib et al, 2018). To define the shear strength for the GQ/H constitutive model, the Mohr-Coulomb model was used.…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The General Quadratic/Hyperbolic (GQ/H) model of Groholski et al (2016) implemented in DEEPSOIL v7 (Hashash et al, 2017) was used to apply the strength correction, which was reported to be important even for shallow deposits in regions of moderate to low seismicity (Aaqib et al, 2018). To define the shear strength for the GQ/H constitutive model, the Mohr-Coulomb model was used.…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-dimensional (1D) ground response analysis is commonly performed to evaluate the seismic hazard of the site-specific area [12][13][14][15]. Shylamoni et al [12] evaluated ground response at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant site (Japan).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satyam and Towhata [14] assessed the ground response and liquefaction of the Vijayawada city (India). Aaqib et al [15] Aaqib et al [16] investigated the strength correction effect of sites in Korea. Recently, several studies have examined seismic hazard assessment of the Hanoi region ground [2,7,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many regions the most common and popular test is SPT. Shear wave velocity profile is developed using SPT-Vs correlations [5][6][7][8][9]. time average soil shear wave velocity (Vs, soil) and depth to bed rock (Dbed, rock) for the shallow bed rock sites [8,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%