2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002270000292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of food quantity to structural growth rate and neutral lipid reserves accumulated in Calanus finmarchicus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If second-year females were present during the bloom, they must have been spawning, considering that 100% of the females present were spawning. The lipid content during post-bloom was, however, somewhat lower compared to findings in Kongsfjorden during August and September (Scott et al 2000).For Calanus hyperboreus, the high carbon increase between pre-and post-bloom conditions could not be explained by an increase in prosome length but rather from the total lipid content since lipid is ~80% carbon (Jónasdóttir 1999, Hygum et al 2000. This was also indicated by the increasing C:N ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If second-year females were present during the bloom, they must have been spawning, considering that 100% of the females present were spawning. The lipid content during post-bloom was, however, somewhat lower compared to findings in Kongsfjorden during August and September (Scott et al 2000).For Calanus hyperboreus, the high carbon increase between pre-and post-bloom conditions could not be explained by an increase in prosome length but rather from the total lipid content since lipid is ~80% carbon (Jónasdóttir 1999, Hygum et al 2000. This was also indicated by the increasing C:N ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…For Calanus hyperboreus, the high carbon increase between pre-and post-bloom conditions could not be explained by an increase in prosome length but rather from the total lipid content since lipid is ~80% carbon (Jónasdóttir 1999, Hygum et al 2000. This was also indicated by the increasing C:N ratio.…”
Section: Biomass and Lipidsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The same correlations were found for dry weight (DW) and prosome length (Viitasalo et al 1995;Hirst and Lampitt 1998), food concentration (Koski et al 1998) and predator abundance (Wahlstroem et al 2000). The energy (lipid) content also varies during the season and depends on food availability (Cripps and Hill 1998;Nanton and Castel 1999;Hygum et al 2000). Lipid storage is especially important for polar copepod species, increasing over the course of the growing season in preparation for winter diapause (Bathmann et al 1993;Kosobokova 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Thus, tropical species (Acartia sinjiensis) have low lipid content (from 11 to 26% from DW), whereas the same parameter for Arctic copepods (Calanus glacialis, Metridia longa) varies from 37 to 54% (Lee 1975a;McKinnon et al 2003). Diapausing copepods, which enter deep waters after feeding on phytoplankton during spring/ summer blooms or at the end of upwelling periods, are characterized by large oil sacs Wlled with wax esters (WEs; Hygum et al 2000), which in turn could be utilized during starvation (Lee 1975b). The thermal expansion and compressibility of these WEs may allow copepods in diapause to be neutrally buoyant in cold deep waters, reducing energy costs to remain at these depths (Lee et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, generation time from CI to adults in Calanus euxinus during winter-spring homothermy should not be less than 50 d. If we add to this value the duration of development of eggs and nauplii amounting to 16 d at (n) C. pacificus, 8°C (Vidal 1980b); (m) C. finmarchicus, 8°C (Fransz & van Arkel, 1980); (j) C. finmarchicus, 8°C (Carlotti et al 1993); (h) C. finmarchicus, 10°C (Harris et al 2000); (e) C. finmarchicus, 5.1 to 8.3°C (Hygum et al 2000); (s) C. finmarchicus, 8°C (Campbell et al 2001); (r) C. helgolandicus, April, the North Sea (Kattner & Krause, 1987) 8°C (Corkett et al 1986, Campbell et al 2001, total development time for C. euxinus will be about 66 d, in contrast to 43.6 and 32 to 46 d in C. finmarchicus (Corkett et al 1986), Campbell et al 2001). However, the development time in C. euxinus may be underestimated because we have included in our calculation absolute growth rates which are close to maximum net growth efficiency for preadult and adult copepods (Ikeda et al 2001).…”
Section: Reconstruction Of Growth In Body Weight and Estimation Of Stmentioning
confidence: 99%