2006
DOI: 10.1093/auk/123.4.962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of Facial Pattern to Sexual Selection in Golden-Winged Warbler (Vermivora Chrysoptera)

Abstract: The importance of the black facial pattern in sexual selection in Golden-winged Warblers (Vermivora chrysoptera) was evaluated through experimental plumage modification. We lightened the throat patch and eye mask with hair bleach, which essentially created artificial Brewster's Warbler (F1 generation of Golden-winged Warbler × Blue-winged Warbler [V. pinus]) plumage phenotypes. Experimental males lost their original territories and failed to obtain mates. We concluded that there is sexual selection against the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To be effective, signals must be detected by the receiver and distinguished from the other sensory inputs. Biophysical limits on transmission and background noise are likely to affect exaggerated ornaments less than reduced ornaments, whereas comparison between larger ornaments will be easier, particularly from distance (Endler ; Leichty and Grier ; Fawcett et al ). This means that in general, efficacy is likely to increase as ornaments become larger.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be effective, signals must be detected by the receiver and distinguished from the other sensory inputs. Biophysical limits on transmission and background noise are likely to affect exaggerated ornaments less than reduced ornaments, whereas comparison between larger ornaments will be easier, particularly from distance (Endler ; Leichty and Grier ; Fawcett et al ). This means that in general, efficacy is likely to increase as ornaments become larger.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mammals, studies using phylogenetic techniques similar to ours indicate that dark facial colours may be used in conspecific communication (Stoner et al ., 2003b; Caro & Stankowich, 2010). In birds, dark eye masks, especially their size, are influenced by sexual selection (Tarof et al ., 2005; Leichty & Grier, 2006; Pederson et al ., 2006; Pogány & Székely, 2007; Kingma et al ., 2008). If facial stripes are a sexually selected signal, their loss in arboreal and saxicolous species suggests that signalling is not informative in those habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dark facial markings are found in many vertebrates and several studies suggest that they serve a signalling function, whether to potential predators as an aposematic warning, as suggested for some mammals (Newman, Buesching & Wolff, 2005), or to conspecifics in social interactions (Ortolani, 1999; Stoner, Caro & Graham, 2003b; Caro & Stankowich, 2010). In birds, dark eye masks are influenced by male–male competition, by female mate choice, or by both of these drivers (Tarof, Dunn & Whittingham, 2005; Leichty & Grier, 2006; Pederson, Dunn & Whittingham, 2006; Pogány & Székely, 2007; Kingma et al ., 2008). Because these dark markings are often located near or around the eyes, an alternative explanation is that they function in ecophysiological contexts, such as camouflaging the eye for protection, reducing glare in bright light, or for targeting prey items (see the review by Ficken, Matthiae & Horwich, 1971; Ortolani, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, many examples of hybrid zones appear to be relatively stable (Barton and Hewitt 1985); however, more and more examples of asymmetric introgression are being discovered (Buggs 2007). Evidence for asymmetry can take a number of forms, including direct observation of pairing-related behaviors of hybridizing forms (Bronson et al 2003; Leichty and Grier 2006; Charpentier et al 2012), population genetic estimates of migration rates (Geraldes et al 2008; Mullen et al 2008; Nevado et al 2011; Charpentier et al 2012), patterns of correlation (or lack thereof) among genetic and phenotypic markers (Parsons et al 1993; Rohwer et al 2001; Roca et al 2005; Wang et al 2011; Hailer et al 2012), and long-term observation of hybrid zone movement (Dasmahapatra et al 2002; Carling and Zuckerberg 2011). Another, less commonly-reported pattern that suggests asymmetric hybridization is the disjunct distribution of a phenotype within the range of a phenotypically distinct form or forms with which it is hybridizing (Weisrock et al 2005; Culumber et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%