The handicap hypothesis of sexual selection predicts that sexual ornaments have evolved heightened condition-dependent expression. The prediction has only recently been subject to experimental investigation. Many of the experiments are of limited value as they: (i) fail to compare condition dependence in sexual ornaments with suitable non-sexual trait controls; (ii) do not adequately account for body size variation; and (iii) typically consider no stress and extreme stress manipulations rather than a range of stresses similar to those experienced in nature. There is also a dearth of experimental studies investigating the genetic basis of condition dependence. Despite the common claim that sexual ornaments are conditiondependent, the unexpected conclusion from our literature review is that there is little support from welldesigned experiments.

No abstract

We use a general additive quantitative genetic model to study the evolution of costly female mate choice by the "handicap" principle. Two necessary conditions must be satisfied for costly preference to evolve. The conditions are (i) biased mutation pressure on viability and (ii) a direct relationship between the degree of expression of the male mating character and viability. These two conditions explain the success and failure of previous models of the "handicap" principle. Our model also applies to other sources of fitness variation like migration and host-parasite coevolution, which cause effects equivalent to biased mutation.

Meiotic drivers are genetic variants that selfishly manipulate the production of gametes to increase their own rate of transmission, often to the detriment of the rest of the genome and the individual that carries them. This genomic conflict potentially occurs whenever a diploid organism produces a haploid stage, and can have profound evolutionary impacts on gametogenesis, fertility, individual behaviour, mating system, population survival, and reproductive isolation. Multiple research teams are developing artificial drive systems for pest control, utilising the transmission advantage of drive to alter or exterminate target species. Here, we review current knowledge of how natural drive systems function, how drivers spread through natural populations, and the factors that limit their invasion. Trends Box  Both naturally occurring and synthetic "meiotic drivers" violate Mendel's law of equal segregation and can rapidly spread through populations even when they reduce the fitness of individuals carrying them. Synthetic drivers are being developed to spread desirable genes in natural populations of target species. How ecology influences the population dynamics of meiotic drivers is important for predicting the success of synthetic drive elements. An enduring puzzle concerns why some meiotic drivers persist at stable, intermediate frequencies rather than sweeping to fixation. Drivers can have a wide range of consequences from extinction to changes in mating system. preferentially associating with and moving toward the egg pole at Meiosis I) will be 75 transmitted to more than half of the maturing eggs. Although this bias does not necessarily 76 reduce the production of eggs (as only one egg matures per meiosis), the fitness of other 77 alleles at the same locus, that do not bias transmission, and alleles linked to them, is 78 reduced. Such meiotic drivers could reduce the fitness of individuals that carry them, if the 79 driving variant is genetically linked to deleterious mutations or has deleterious pleiotropic 80 effects. 81Male meiotic drive takes multiple forms -some at least partially meiotic, some entirely 82 post-meiotic -but all involve a driving element that prevents maturation or function of 83 sperm that do not contain it. Because haploid sperm within a single ejaculate compete to 84 fertilize the same pool of eggs, disabling non-carrier sperm results in transmission of the 85 driving element to more than half of the functional gametes and resulting offspring ([5], Box 86 1). However, disabling non-carrier sperm often reduces fertility [6]. 87Spore drive in fungi, in which the products of meiosis are packaged together in an ascus, 88 operates via similar mechanisms. Spores with one haploid genotype will kill or disable 89 spores of the alternative haplotype ([7], Box 1). If spores disperse long distances sibling 90 spores are unlikely to compete and killing them will not increase the killer's fitness. 91However, spore killing can be beneficial if there is local resource competition. 92Excit...