1999
DOI: 10.3354/meps190289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of extracellular organic carbon production in the total primary production by tidal-flat diatoms in comparison to phytoplankton

Abstract: extracted with EDTA) to total primary production (TPP) were rneasured using "C-tracer to estirnate the ratio for each fraction of organic carbon photosynthetically produced by microphytobenthos and phytoplankton. TEOC for rn.icrophytobenthos ranged frorn 4 2 to 73% of TPP and was rnade up mostly of 14C-Colloidal-OC The TEOC/TPP for phytoplankton ranged frorn 1.5 to 220,). The ratio of I4C-EPS to I4C-CoUoidal-OC for rnicrophytobenthos was 41 to 53%, and for phytoplankton was 4.4 to 24%. Algal species in the tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
73
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
73
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope values were, respectively, 0.067, 0.20 and 0.30 for Thalassiosira pseudonana, Skeletonema marinoi and Pseudonitzschia fraudulenta, which signifies that, respectively, 6.7, 20 and 30% of the photosynthetic carbon production was excreted as TEP. Estimations reported in the literature for benthic diatoms, which are known to produce large amounts of EPS, range from 30 to 73% of photosynthate being excreted, whereas for pelagic phytoplankton estimations range from 1.5 to 22% (Goto et al 1999, Smith & Underwood 2000. Because no relationships were found between photosynthetic production and TEP production for the other species, this percentage was estimated at T opt(ETR) at growth irradiance: 17.3% was calculated for Emiliania huxleyi, 6.8% for Isochrysis galbana, 15.9% for I. aff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slope values were, respectively, 0.067, 0.20 and 0.30 for Thalassiosira pseudonana, Skeletonema marinoi and Pseudonitzschia fraudulenta, which signifies that, respectively, 6.7, 20 and 30% of the photosynthetic carbon production was excreted as TEP. Estimations reported in the literature for benthic diatoms, which are known to produce large amounts of EPS, range from 30 to 73% of photosynthate being excreted, whereas for pelagic phytoplankton estimations range from 1.5 to 22% (Goto et al 1999, Smith & Underwood 2000. Because no relationships were found between photosynthetic production and TEP production for the other species, this percentage was estimated at T opt(ETR) at growth irradiance: 17.3% was calculated for Emiliania huxleyi, 6.8% for Isochrysis galbana, 15.9% for I. aff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underwood et al 1995, Underwood & Smith 1998. These carbohydrates constitute a major part of the carbon fixed by microphytobenthos (Goto et al 1999, Smith & Underwood 2000 and may serve as an important substrate for bacteria (van Duyl et al 1999, Goto et al 2001). The strong relationship between bacterial production and the chl a content of the sediment therefore suggests that in our study bacterial production was mainly regulated by substrate supply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large part of benthic microalgal production is thought to pass through the macrofaunal grazing/deposit feeding chain (Asmus & Asmus 1985, Duarte & Cebrián 1996, Herman et al 2000, while part of it may also be channeled through the 'small food chain' consisting of micro-and meiofauna (Kuipers et al 1981, Sundbäck et al 1996, Pinckney et al 2003. However, since much of the organic matter is released as DOM by live and dead material (Goto et al 1999, Wolfstein et al 2002, processing of particulate organic matter by grazers and bacteria may only account for a portion of the total carbon fixed by benthic microalgae. During the initial stage of eutrophication, grazing of benthic microalgae by meiofauna can be expected to increase (Nilsson et al 1991), however, we still lack a clear understanding of how grazing modulates the benthic microalgal response to nutrient loading (Hillebrand & Kahlert 2002).…”
Section: Fate Of Plant-bound Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%