2012
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2012.688110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of diameter-to-length ratio in selecting dental implants: a methodological finite element study

Abstract: Implant dimensions greatly influence load transfer characteristics and the lifetime of a dental system. Excessive stresses at peri-implant area may result in bone failure. Finding the critical point at the implant-bone interface and evaluating the influence of implant diameter-to-length ratio on adjacent bone stresses makes it possible to select implant dimensions. For this, different cylindrical implants were numerically analysed using geometrical models generated from computed tomography images of mandible w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(72 reference statements)
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our study are in agreement with the numerical results of Demenko's study and the conclusion of Baggi et al [2] that implant diameter can be considered a more effective design parameter than implant length [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of our study are in agreement with the numerical results of Demenko's study and the conclusion of Baggi et al [2] that implant diameter can be considered a more effective design parameter than implant length [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Demenko et al [9] suggested that an increase in implant length and diameter leads to a reduction in stress magnitudes within cortical bone. The results of our study are in agreement with the numerical results of Demenko's study and the conclusion of Baggi et al [2] that implant diameter can be considered a more effective design parameter than implant length [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[5] The length of the bone segment in the mesio-distal direction was 20 mm to localize the stress around the implant. [10] In the buccal-lingual direction it was 12.5 mm thick and the height was 22.5 mm. The entire volume of the bone was considered to be a homogeneous, isotropic material with the character of cortical bone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancellous bone changes its structure after osseointegration and the bone–implant interface becomes more similar to the cortical bone. [10] [Elastic modulus (E) = 1.37 × 10 4 M Pa, Poisson's ratio (u) = 0.3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lack of periodontal ligament transfer in dental implant, the forces of chewing will transfer directly to the surrounding bones near the implant. Therefore, much effort has been devoted to investigate the relation between the characteristics of dental implant and the stress distribution near the dental implant-bone interface [1][2][3][4][5]. The most common cause of failure in dental implant is inadequate bone formation around the biomaterial immediately after implantation [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%