2016
DOI: 10.1515/secm-2015-0392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative finite element analysis of two types of axial and radial functionally graded dental implants with titanium one around implant-bone interface

Abstract: Functionally graded biomaterials (FGBMs) have received significant attention in the recent years as potential candidates for the next generation of dental implant improvement. This happened due to their unique advantages and their ability to satisfy the requirements of both biomechanical and biocompatibility properties simultaneously. This study was aimed to analyze the effects of two radial and axial FGBM dental implants on the stress distribution near the dental implant-bone interface under a static load usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mesh size was achieved by gradually reducing the default mesh size of the implant until the stress curve started to flatten out and a constant result was obtained. Implant 114000 0,34 [22], [23], [26] Embedding Material 4400 0,29 [19], [21] [A]…”
Section: 12finite Element Analysis Mesh Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesh size was achieved by gradually reducing the default mesh size of the implant until the stress curve started to flatten out and a constant result was obtained. Implant 114000 0,34 [22], [23], [26] Embedding Material 4400 0,29 [19], [21] [A]…”
Section: 12finite Element Analysis Mesh Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two factors affecting the simulation were implant material and surface roughness. Optimum implant material properties lead to increased bone regeneration and early stabilization of the dental implant system (Shamami, Karimi, Beigzadeh, Haghpanahi, & Navidbakhsh, 2014;Shirazi, Ayatollahi, Karimi, & Navidbakhsh, 2016). Increased surface roughness increases the friction coefficient between the material surfaces (Dos Santos, Elias, & Cavalcanti Lima, 2011).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functionally graded dental implants, as a new design of such systems with elective configurations, have attracted substantial attention in the last decade as potential candidates for the next generation of dental implants [13,14]. In fact, functionally graded biomaterials (FGBMs) have been recently introduced in dental implants owing to their unique advantages and being able to satisfy simultaneously many requirements and possess properties such as nontoxicity, corrosion resistance, thermal conductivity, strength, fatigue durability, and biocompatibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, FGBM implants were usually graded in radial direction [15][16][17][18][19][20]. They showed that employing axial FGBM implants resulted in stress reduction in the implanted bone [14][15][16][17] and biocompatibility improvement in the dental implant system [18][19][20]. As an alternative approach, the gradient can be distributed radially so that the properties of radial FGBM implant varied gradually from a stiffer biomaterial in the center of the implant to a more biocompatible and bioactive material as the outer layer in contact with the hosting bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%