2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impoliteness as a rhetorical strategy in Spain's politics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data analysis first reveals that the impoliteness realizations, in marriage communication, are in general accordance with the widely acknowledged set of impoliteness (e.g., Bousfield, 2008;Garrido Ardila, 2019). This is accounted in the words of Terkourafi (2015), "conventionalization" in linguistic behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data analysis first reveals that the impoliteness realizations, in marriage communication, are in general accordance with the widely acknowledged set of impoliteness (e.g., Bousfield, 2008;Garrido Ardila, 2019). This is accounted in the words of Terkourafi (2015), "conventionalization" in linguistic behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In impoliteness studies, the rhetorical realizations of "condescend, scorn, ridicule" explicitly associate others with a negative aspect (Garrido Ardila, 2019). In this study, based on the couple's complaints, the pattern of 'condescend' was barely found in their marriage.…”
Section: Excerptmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In Ardila's view, the communicator does not necessarily speak to the other person but to the whole nation. When it is indicated that his speech diction does not respect his speech opponent, it affects his self-image (Ardila 2019). Brown and Levinson emphasized that speakers must not let the other person have a negative face for disrespectful speech (Brown & Levinson, 1988;Wang, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This slogan was only one of the many examples that were made creatively. Impoliteness is often seen in the literature as a “rhetorical strategy” ( Ardila, 2019 ) or “discursive strategy” ( Ladegaard, 2012 ), since it is repeatedly used in a similar pattern to achieve an intended function. Similarly, the threatening language or impoliteness in the blunt slogans could have been a rhetorical strategy adopted by the government to optimize their effectiveness or fulfill the health prevention function, if viewed from the perspective of the creators of the blunt slogans.…”
Section: Blunt Slogans and The Public's Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%