2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicitly measured aggressiveness self-concepts in women with borderline personality disorder as assessed by an Implicit Association Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were aged between 13 and 18, with a mean age of 16.6 (SD = 0.9). The sample size was based on similar papers from the field [e.g., ( 29 , 30 )]. All participants were assessed individually with the AIDA-IAT using a laptop and completed self-report measures by paper and pen after informed consent was obtained by their legal guardians.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Participants were aged between 13 and 18, with a mean age of 16.6 (SD = 0.9). The sample size was based on similar papers from the field [e.g., ( 29 , 30 )]. All participants were assessed individually with the AIDA-IAT using a laptop and completed self-report measures by paper and pen after informed consent was obtained by their legal guardians.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of studies vary according to the disorder, and it seems the two different IATs share the basic structure of tasks, but that is their only commonality ( 26 ); therefore, it is necessary to adjust the IAT for each disorder ( 24 ). In the context of BPD, IATs have been utilized to assess implicit associations between the self-concept and shame ( 27 , 28 ), as well as neuroticism ( 29 ) and aggressiveness ( 30 ). All studies reported significant differences between women with BPD and a healthy control group, which is in line with findings that an IAT can show mean differences between groups and classify individuals into opposing groups ( 22 , 31 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of note, Rüsch, Lieb, et al (2017) assessed shame relative to anxiety, but advocated for future research to explore shame relative to pride. For the second IAT evaluating a guilt-prone self-concept, target categories remained unchanged and attribute categories were changed to “guilt” and “innocence.” Similar to previous studies (Banse et al, 2015; Baumann et al, 2020; Cludius et al, 2017; Schmidt et al, 2015), in both IATs, the “other” dimension was represented by occupational labels (e.g., cook or farmer) instead of the more commonly used labels of “them” or “others” to ensure that participants would not associate “others” with particularly shameful or proud persons (or guilty vs. innocent persons, respectively).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is useful to apply both implicit and explicit measures of shame and guilt. This is also important because previous findings indicate the high impact of negative implicit self-concepts in BPD (Baumann et al, 2020;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%