Implicit security: A social cognitive model and assessment of attachment security in romantic relationships

Robinson, Michael D.; Persich, Michelle R.; Towers, Crystal M.; Sjoblom-Schmidt, Simone; Penzel, Ian B.

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110530

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This SJT started with a series of romantic relationship scenarios (Robinson, Penzel, & Persich, 2020) and participants were asked what they would do in the largely problematic or uncertain situations involving themselves and a romantic partner. A key innovation was that each way of responding to each situation was given an expert rating of attachment security and participant endorsements were correlated with this prototype (Robinson, Persich, Towers, Sjoblom-Schmidt, & Penzel, 2021). Participants who received higher implicit security scores were more satisfied with their romantic partners and had partners who were also more satisfied and committed to them.…”

Section: Toward a Greater Integration Of Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Five Approaches to Understanding Interpersonal Competence: A Review and Integration

Persich

Robinson

2022

Review of General Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social connectedness has been linked to beneficial outcomes across domains, ages, and cultures. However, not everyone receives these benefits, as there are large individual differences in the capacities required to create and sustain functional interpersonal relationships. A great deal of research has been devoted to assessing and understanding these differences, often focusing on how competent interpersonal behavior renders it more likely that one will succeed interpersonally. The current paper examines five relevant approaches that have emerged from personality (global traits), social (social cognition), clinical (social skills interventions), developmental (social information processing), and industrial/organizational (situation judgment) areas of psychology. A comparison of these approaches highlights important considerations related to bandwidth and fidelity, whether the focus should be on overt behavior or underlying processes, and whether to emphasize tendencies or their effectiveness. The review concludes with calls for greater integration efforts, which can capitalize on strengths inherent to different approaches.

show abstract

Section: Toward a Greater Integration Of Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%