2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit bias in stroke care: A recurring old problem in the rising incidence of young stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Newman-Toker et al ( 74 ) found that adult patients under the age of 44 were seven times more likely to be misdiagnosed following stroke when compared to patients over the age of 75. Bhat et al ( 75 ) have highlighted the role of “implicit bias” within clinicians in contributing to stroke misdiagnosis in younger survivors, believed to be a result of the way clinicians are taught to recognize stroke through identifying classical symptoms, signs and patient risk profiles. This can reinforce the idea of a “stereotypic presentation” of stroke through pattern recognition; resulting in those who do not meet these criteria being at increased risk of misdiagnosis ( 75 ) (p. 30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Newman-Toker et al ( 74 ) found that adult patients under the age of 44 were seven times more likely to be misdiagnosed following stroke when compared to patients over the age of 75. Bhat et al ( 75 ) have highlighted the role of “implicit bias” within clinicians in contributing to stroke misdiagnosis in younger survivors, believed to be a result of the way clinicians are taught to recognize stroke through identifying classical symptoms, signs and patient risk profiles. This can reinforce the idea of a “stereotypic presentation” of stroke through pattern recognition; resulting in those who do not meet these criteria being at increased risk of misdiagnosis ( 75 ) (p. 30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhat et al ( 75 ) have highlighted the role of “implicit bias” within clinicians in contributing to stroke misdiagnosis in younger survivors, believed to be a result of the way clinicians are taught to recognize stroke through identifying classical symptoms, signs and patient risk profiles. This can reinforce the idea of a “stereotypic presentation” of stroke through pattern recognition; resulting in those who do not meet these criteria being at increased risk of misdiagnosis ( 75 ) (p. 30). This profiling extends beyond age and can include a variety of criteria such as gender, typical stroke symptoms or traditional risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the intuition decision-making process can also be hypothesised as an explicit and implicit decision-making style (Tabesh and Vera, 2020), where explicit decision utilises feelings or emotion and implicit decisions refer to the experience of the relevant situation (Bhat et al ., 2021; Remmers et al ., 2016). Moreover, intuitive decision-making styles also utilise the subconscious processing of verbalised and nonverbalised facts or information (Tabesh and Vera, 2020).…”
Section: Strategic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, the incidence of stroke in young people (< 65 years of age) has increased by 25%, with 10 to 14% of all strokes observed in people younger than 50 years of age [1,3]. Despite the increasing incidence of strokes in young people, stroke continues to be more prevalent in older individuals meaning the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and management of strokes continues to primarily accommodate older, rather than younger individuals [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public health campaigns are aimed at reducing risk factors for stroke more commonly associated with stroke in those over 65 years of age, particularly modi able risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and smoking [1,3]. They are also aimed at reducing the impact of stroke through symptom recognition and early intervention, of which the FAST acronym is an example (facial drooping, arm weakness, or speech di culties should instigate a timely response re ecting a medical emergency) [4]. The success of these campaigns and overall interventions are not as effective in younger stroke survivors as they are for older people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%