2006
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model.

Abstract: Traditional models of attitude change have assumed that when people appear to have changed their attitudes in response to new information, their old attitudes disappear and no longer have any impact. The present research suggests that when attitudes change, the old attitude can remain in memory and influence subsequent behavior. Four experiments are reported in which initial attitudes were created and then changed (or not) with new information. In each study, the authors demonstrate that when people undergo at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
306
7
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(338 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(111 reference statements)
24
306
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with some prior research suggesting that automatic evaluations as measured by the IAT can sometimes change in response to advertisements (Czyzewska & Ginsburg, 2007;Maio et al, 2009;Park, Felix, & Lee, 2007) and other treatments involving verbal information (e.g., Petty et al, 2006;Teachman & Woody, 2003; see Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, for a review). Although this research demonstrates that automatic evaluations can be influenced by traditional persuasive messages, it is unclear what the psychological processes were underlying the obtained effects, and whether those changes were consequential.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These findings are consistent with some prior research suggesting that automatic evaluations as measured by the IAT can sometimes change in response to advertisements (Czyzewska & Ginsburg, 2007;Maio et al, 2009;Park, Felix, & Lee, 2007) and other treatments involving verbal information (e.g., Petty et al, 2006;Teachman & Woody, 2003; see Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, for a review). Although this research demonstrates that automatic evaluations can be influenced by traditional persuasive messages, it is unclear what the psychological processes were underlying the obtained effects, and whether those changes were consequential.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…They seem, however, to be inconsistent with dual-process models which assume that implicit attitudes assessed with indirect measures are highly stable and difficult to change (see Wilson et al, 2000;Petty, Tormala, Brinol, & Jarvis, 2006), because these models can not account for an asymmetrical pattern of self-esteem change that involves an alteration of implicit but not explicit self-esteem (see Experiment 1 or 3, respectively). The RIM or the APE-Model, in contrast, allow for such patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, the theory assumes that newly acquired counterattitudinal information is simply added to the existing memory structures instead of erasing initially acquired attitudinal information from memory (cf. Petty, Tormala, Briñol, & Jarvis, 2006;Wilson, Lindsey, & Schooler, 2000). Hence, if a person is confronted with counterattitudinal information about an object that conflicts with initially acquired attitudinal information, the mental representation of the object is assumed to acquire a "dual" nature that involves (1) a context-free representation of the initial attitudinal information, and (2) a contextualized representation of the expectancy-violating counterattitudinal information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%