2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of crop model ensemble size and composition for estimates of adaptation effects and agreement of recommendations

Abstract: Highlights Crop model ensemble size and composition affect the ensemble outputs. Recommendations on adaptation are sensitive to model ensemble composition and size. The new EOA index effectively measures the confidence level of recommendations. Effective adaptation of wheat in the Mediterranean is feasible with high confidence. The EOA index can be applied to assess confidence in many other contexts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(74 reference statements)
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean number of seasons (out of 29) for the studied periods where chilling requirements are compromised at the indicated location. Roman et al (1998). g Richardson et al (1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mean number of seasons (out of 29) for the studied periods where chilling requirements are compromised at the indicated location. Roman et al (1998). g Richardson et al (1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be possible to use a hypothesis-based index such as the ensemble outcome agreement index (e.g. EOA; Rodríguez et al, 2019) to test the robustness of a hypothesis that imposes a conservative threshold, for example, considering the threshold for a variety to meet the "safe winter chill" requirements at a specific location and time (Luedeling et al, 2009a). By doing this, suitable zones for a given variety could be calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We documented the variability of the multi‐model simulation exercise across two stages (blind test and alternative calibration scenarios) while inspecting how the multi‐model median (MMM) converged to the observations. We used box‐plots to compare the variability of estimates by different models (with focus on multi‐year averages) to the observed variability, and we represented model ensembles with MMM, which has the advantage to exclude distinctly biased model members with a disproportionate influence on the mean (Rodríguez et al., 2019). The advantage of using MMM was established in practical studies in crop and grassland modelling but also on a theoretical basis (Wallach et al., 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such limitations include uncertainty about CC impacts and adaptive responses. The use of impact (Pirttioja et al, 2015) and adaptation response surfaces (Ruiz-Ramos et al, 2018) together with robustness indexes of adaptation recommendations (Rodríguez et al, 2018) have been used in biophysical models to address this challenge. Uncertainty makes developing sound protocols for adaptation modelling vital in preventing model misuse and reducing the potential for incorrect or misinterpreted outputs to drive mal-adaptive change (Ramirez-Villegas et al, 2015).…”
Section: Illustrative Reviews Of Modelling Climate Change Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%