2000
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3780141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implication of Interleukin-4 in Wound Healing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
2
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
72
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous report demonstrated that topical administration of IL-4 significantly accelerated wound healing, whereas IL-4 antisense oligonucleotides significantly inhibited healing. 26 By contrast, IL-10 is an inhibitory factor for the remodeling of extracellular matrix during wound healing. 40 Addition of a neutralizing anti-IL-10 Ab inhibits the infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages toward the wound.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous report demonstrated that topical administration of IL-4 significantly accelerated wound healing, whereas IL-4 antisense oligonucleotides significantly inhibited healing. 26 By contrast, IL-10 is an inhibitory factor for the remodeling of extracellular matrix during wound healing. 40 Addition of a neutralizing anti-IL-10 Ab inhibits the infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages toward the wound.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to IL-4 leads to an increase in collagen production in the lungs (4,13), and correlates with the amount of hepatic fibrosis (14). Normal wound healing is accelerated by IL-4 (2,15). Treatment with anti-IL-4 and the targeted mutation of IL-4R␣ prevent dermal fibrosis in the tight-skin mouse model of scleroderma (16,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IL-4 is known to be a fibrogenic cytokine that promotes biogenesis of ECM proteins in normal wound healing and in pathological fibrosis (7,54). The present findings potentially have important clinical implications in dermal wound healing and many fibrotic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%