2017
DOI: 10.1515/sjph-2017-0029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing quality indicators for diabetes and hypertension in family medicine in Slovenia

Abstract: IntroductionA new form of family practices was introduced in 2011 through a pilot project introducing nurse practitioners as members of team and determining a set of quality indicators. The aim of this article was to assess the quality of diabetes and hypertension management.MethodsWe included all family medicine practices that were participating in the project in December 2015 (N=584). The following data were extracted from automatic electronic reports on quality indicators: gender and specialisation of the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Slovenia, quality and safety at the primary health care level have been the focus of study over the past several years [19–22]. Patient safety features in primary healthcare have been investigated through a study on the Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe (QUALICOPC), dealing with the organisation and accessibility of primary healthcare services [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Slovenia, quality and safety at the primary health care level have been the focus of study over the past several years [19–22]. Patient safety features in primary healthcare have been investigated through a study on the Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe (QUALICOPC), dealing with the organisation and accessibility of primary healthcare services [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is important to become familiar with relevant service quality dimensions and define actionable variables for potential improvements (Tripathi & Siddiqui, 2018). Our article aims to promote the development of relevant quality indicators of services in the healthcare sector (Klemenc-Ketiš et al, 2017) and to offer insight into the topic of knowledge management in the healthcare sector (Han & Pashouwers, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As data for all our variables were obtained in a one-time single survey, we acknowledge that common method bias might be a methodological issue. With our research, we aim to contribute towards building a cohesive body of literature regarding the quality of healthcare services and knowledge management in the context of public sector organisations (Al Ahbabi et al, 2019) that is currently limited and fragmented (Klemenc-Ketiš et al, 2017;Oluikpe, 2012). In agreement with our overarching theory of the knowledge-based view of the organisation (Grant, 1996;Hislop et al, 2018;Kogut & Zander, 2003), which emphasises the paramount role of knowledge in organisations, our research assumed the relationship between knowledge management and organisational factors as one of the primary sources influencing the quality of services in healthcare institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General practitioners (GPs) throughout Europe oppose the use of quality indicators for pay-for-performance, since the core competences of GP care, like person-centred care, continuity of care or safe prescribing cannot be measured easily. Furthermore, the focus on indicators leads physicians and nurses to spend a substantial part of their time on registration and administration, instead of on the care for patients (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%