Abstract:Despite increasing scholarship on learning-oriented assessment (LOA) and the promotion of LOA in various educational contexts, few studies have examined the challenges faced by language teachers while implementing LOA in authentic educational settings, especially an exam-dominant context that is deemed unconducive to LOA implementation (Carless, 2017). Even fewer have investigated the complexity of LOA implementation in such a context with students of limited proficiency. The present case study, therefore, foc… Show more
“…Additionally, exploring learner autonomy's role, as it pertains to the success of LOA implementation, could be a fruitful area for future research (Zhao & Qi, 2022). To enhance the precision and broad applicability of results, future studies might consider extending the intervention period of this study.…”
The notion of utilizing assessment to facilitate learning has garnered significant momentum in language education. Nevertheless, a substantial portion of the pertinent theoretical and research literature tends to concentrate on the dynamics of the teaching-learning interface, often neglecting the critical role of effective teacher and peer interaction in augmenting student learning. The current study explored the learning-oriented assessment of EFL learners’ writing ability. Specifically, the study involved the development and administration of learning-oriented writing assessment (LOWA) tasks that aimed to measure 67 learners’ ability to display competency in L2 writing ability by building an argument. In addition, the study aimed to examine whether implementing LOWA tasks can help enhance learners’ academic resilience. Following a quasi-experimental mixed-methods approach, results from the assessment administration were analyzed using robust statistical analyses and qualitative analysis of the responses. A learning-oriented approach to assessment as a design and validation framework was used to interpret qualitative and quantitative evidence. The findings revealed that the students’ L2 argumentative writing ability and academic resilience improved as a result of the LOWA tasks where the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in the post-test. Moreover, focus-group interviews revealed favorable perspectives towards LOWA while also expressing some concerns on giving feedback. It is hoped that this research will shed light on the language assessment within complex tasks and will help understand the affordances of implementing embedded assistance in language assessment.
“…Additionally, exploring learner autonomy's role, as it pertains to the success of LOA implementation, could be a fruitful area for future research (Zhao & Qi, 2022). To enhance the precision and broad applicability of results, future studies might consider extending the intervention period of this study.…”
The notion of utilizing assessment to facilitate learning has garnered significant momentum in language education. Nevertheless, a substantial portion of the pertinent theoretical and research literature tends to concentrate on the dynamics of the teaching-learning interface, often neglecting the critical role of effective teacher and peer interaction in augmenting student learning. The current study explored the learning-oriented assessment of EFL learners’ writing ability. Specifically, the study involved the development and administration of learning-oriented writing assessment (LOWA) tasks that aimed to measure 67 learners’ ability to display competency in L2 writing ability by building an argument. In addition, the study aimed to examine whether implementing LOWA tasks can help enhance learners’ academic resilience. Following a quasi-experimental mixed-methods approach, results from the assessment administration were analyzed using robust statistical analyses and qualitative analysis of the responses. A learning-oriented approach to assessment as a design and validation framework was used to interpret qualitative and quantitative evidence. The findings revealed that the students’ L2 argumentative writing ability and academic resilience improved as a result of the LOWA tasks where the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in the post-test. Moreover, focus-group interviews revealed favorable perspectives towards LOWA while also expressing some concerns on giving feedback. It is hoped that this research will shed light on the language assessment within complex tasks and will help understand the affordances of implementing embedded assistance in language assessment.
“…Identifying students' specific needs in these areas can assist teachers in better planning for the redesign process and preparing tailored materials or resources. Moreover, future studies should explore the autonomy of the students as it played crucial role in the success of LOA implementation (Zhao & Qi, 2022). Considering students' motivation was also essential for future research.…”
Learning-oriented reading assessment (LORA) has expanded multiple views of assessment for learning reading. Most EFL reading assessment contexts tended not to utilise feedback and self-assessment for the redesign of authentic tasks and tests. This mixed-methods study investigated how LORA enhanced EFL students’ reading after the implementation of LORA. Participants consist of sixty-seven tenth Grade Thai students from the urban public school. They were divided into two groups, including 32 students for the LORA group and 35 students for the control group. The reading test was designed to compare post-test scores of both groups and was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-test. In addition to perceptions on assessment, only those in the LORA group responded to the LORA questionnaire to give their perceptions of the assessment, and the three highest-ranking and the three lowest-ranking students were selected for the semi-structured interviews to explore five aspects of the design, including task, test, teacher’s observation, feedback, and redesign. Findings from the questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics whereas the semi-structured interview was categorized through thematic analysis. Although there was no statistically significant difference between groups, students in the LORA group tended to gain higher scores on reading after participating in the study. They perceived positively on the implementation. Implications indicated connecting reading assessment and feedback for learning with authentic tasks and tests.
“…The extensive literature in the field (Coggi, 2022;Grion & Serbati, 2019;Lipnevich et al, 2021;Nicol, 2021) recognises assessment as a strategic moment in teaching/learning, capable of improving the learning process of students (Boud & Falchikov, 2007;Doria et al, 2023). However, research notes that in order to implement an 'effective' assessment in relation to the learning contexts in which it is implemented, alternative practice (Dochy et al, 1999), capable of engaging and providing lifelong learning skills for students, must be used (Nicol, 2021;Panadero & Lipnevich, 2022), oriented by participatory assessment approaches (Carless, 2017;Sambell et al, 2013;Zhao & Qi, 2022).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Alternative Assessment In Higher Educa...mentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.