2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18132.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Coteaching and Cogenerative Dialoguing in Urban Science Education

Abstract: Over the past 7 years the authors have been involved in the development of a new model for the education of science teachers that has the potential to address teacher education in challenging urban settings characterized by problems such as teacher turnover and retention, low job satisfaction, and contradictions arising from cultural and ethnic diversity. An intensive research program accompanied the development effort; the research results were used as resources in redesigning the evolving model to make it mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…teacher educators, teachers and pre-service teachers are often viewed as belonging to different learning communities, the development of shared meaning making through co-generative dialoguing (Tobin & Roth, 2005) can provide an opportunity to integrate theory and practice and allow differences in agendas and perspectives to be shared and acknowledged (Goodnough, Osmond, Dibbon, Glassman & Stevens, 2009). Le Cornu (2009) described a re-conceptualised practicum programme where a faculty lecturer took responsibility for the 25 pre-service teachers in a workshop group (learning circle) -on-campus, on-line, and in-school components of the course.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…teacher educators, teachers and pre-service teachers are often viewed as belonging to different learning communities, the development of shared meaning making through co-generative dialoguing (Tobin & Roth, 2005) can provide an opportunity to integrate theory and practice and allow differences in agendas and perspectives to be shared and acknowledged (Goodnough, Osmond, Dibbon, Glassman & Stevens, 2009). Le Cornu (2009) described a re-conceptualised practicum programme where a faculty lecturer took responsibility for the 25 pre-service teachers in a workshop group (learning circle) -on-campus, on-line, and in-school components of the course.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer coaching is "a training method in which pairs of students, student teachers, or classroom teachers observe each other and provide consultative assistance in correctly applying teaching skills and proposing alternative solutions to recognized instructional needs" (Wynn & Kromrey, 1999, p. 21). Co-generative dialoguing (Roth & Tobin, 2002;Tobin & Roth, 2005) is the practice of having all co-learners (e.g., mentor teachers, student teachers, and university supervisors) meet to discuss lessons taught by student teachers, along with other relevant aspects of teaching (e.g., different teaching methods). Such collaboration promotes teacher efficacy (Nokes et al, 2008), and peer coaching holds promise for encouraging teacher development (Le Cornu, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of early research studies on teacher mentoring clearly show that a mentor can play an important role in the development of a pre-service teacher's teaching expertise during a field-based practicum experience (Guyton & McIntyre, 1990). However, more recently, researchers have focused on how collaboration with a peer or a group of co-teachers affects pre-service teachers' experiences during the practicum (Bullough et al, 2003;Roth & Tobin, 2004;Tobin & Roth, 2005). Whereas a traditional model of mentoring requires a single mentor to work with a single pre-service teacher, a partner (or peer) teaching model places two pre-service teachers with one mentor.…”
Section: Teacher Mentoringmentioning
confidence: 99%