2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-021-02159-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Brazil’s Forest Code: a vital contribution to securing forests and conserving biodiversity

Abstract: Meeting Brazil’s ambitious national commitments on both climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation depends on securing its reserves of forest carbon and biodiversity. Brazil’s ‘Forest Code’ is a key tool to reconcile environmental preservation and agricultural production; it limits deforestation and requires forest restoration in illegally deforested areas. However, not all provisions of the law’s 2012 revision have yet been implemented and some are facing new challenges. Using modelled land use c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although scientific evidence increasingly supports strong protections for nonpermanent waters, those water bodies may warrant different protections than permanent waters, as has occurred in several States for riparian ecosystems (e.g., FEMAT 1993; Colvin et al 2019; Boisjolie et al 2017; Brock et al 2021; Kampf et al 2021; Table 1). For example, Oregon and Washington require different riparian buffer widths for nonpermanent streams draining private lands, for nonfish‐bearing perennial streams on forest land, and for fish‐bearing perennial streams on forest land.…”
Section: State Some Mostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scientific evidence increasingly supports strong protections for nonpermanent waters, those water bodies may warrant different protections than permanent waters, as has occurred in several States for riparian ecosystems (e.g., FEMAT 1993; Colvin et al 2019; Boisjolie et al 2017; Brock et al 2021; Kampf et al 2021; Table 1). For example, Oregon and Washington require different riparian buffer widths for nonpermanent streams draining private lands, for nonfish‐bearing perennial streams on forest land, and for fish‐bearing perennial streams on forest land.…”
Section: State Some Mostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a private reserve of about 21,000 ha, owned by the mining company VALE S.A. with the goal of preserving biodiversity (no mining occurs at this site). It is within the Atlantic Forest Biome (as described by Brazilian Law 11.428/ 2006 (Brock et al, 2021)), and it is represented predominantly by dense ombrophilous forest, characterized by being evergreen, with emergent trees that can reach up to 50 m in height (Jesus & Rolim, 2005). The climate of RNV is tropical hot and humid (Aw) under the Köppen classification, with a wet season in the summer (October-March) and dry season in the winter (April-September; Jesus & Rolim, 2005).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous modeling studies [7,36,38] and reviews [5] have investigated the potential implications of the FC on land use change, or the impact of land use change on Brazilian species [4,10,37,42]. Other research has looked at the influence of the FC on biodiversity in certain biomes or regions [6,32,43,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%