2007
DOI: 10.1075/cilt.290.18dad
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing an open source Arabic resource grammar in GF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As of 2019, the RGL has "complete" implementations of 35 languages-complete in the sense of covering the common abstract syntax and a set of inflectional morphology paradigms able to produce all word forms. The non-Indo-European languages are Arabic (Dada and Ranta 2006), Basque, Chinese , Estonian (Listenmaa and Kaljurand 2014), Finnish, Japanese (Zimina 2012), Maltese (Camilleri 2013), Mongolian (Erdenebadrakh 2015), and Thai. At least 20 more languages are under construction, many of them Bantu languages (e.g., Ng'ang'a 2012, Pretorius, Marais, andBerg 2017, Kituku, Nganga, andMuchemi 2019).…”
Section: The Rgl Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of 2019, the RGL has "complete" implementations of 35 languages-complete in the sense of covering the common abstract syntax and a set of inflectional morphology paradigms able to produce all word forms. The non-Indo-European languages are Arabic (Dada and Ranta 2006), Basque, Chinese , Estonian (Listenmaa and Kaljurand 2014), Finnish, Japanese (Zimina 2012), Maltese (Camilleri 2013), Mongolian (Erdenebadrakh 2015), and Thai. At least 20 more languages are under construction, many of them Bantu languages (e.g., Ng'ang'a 2012, Pretorius, Marais, andBerg 2017, Kituku, Nganga, andMuchemi 2019).…”
Section: The Rgl Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GF Resource Grammar Library implements a comprehensive fragment of fourteen natural languages: Bulgarian (Angelov, 2008), Catalan, Danish, English, Finnish (Ranta, 2008), French, German, Italian, Norwegian (bokmål), Polish, Romanian, Russian (Khegai, 2006a), Spanish, and Swedish, and the artificial language Interlingua (Union Mundial pro Interlingua, 2001). Also fragments of Arabic (Dada and Ranta, 2007), Dutch, Hindi/Urdu (Humayoun et al, 2007), Latin, Thai, and Turkish are available, and about 15 more languages are under construction. The availability of such a set of languages as an easy-to-use library has made GF into a tool for several projects in multilingual authoring and generation (Khegai et al, 2003, Burke andJohannisson, 2005), dialogue systems (Ljunglöf et al, 2006, Perera andRanta, 2007), technical translation (Khegai, 2006b, Caprotti, 2006, multilingual web pages moises-gotal, and tools for controlled languages (Ranta and Angelov, 2009).…”
Section: Grammars As Software Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other languages may need paradigms with a few more forms, but in general, smart paradigms have proven to be an efficient and intuitive way for building lexica, either manually or as a device for enriching word lists with morphological information. The programming constructs of GF scale up to complex morphological systems such as Arabic (El Dada and Ranta 2007) and Finnish (Ranta 2008). In Finnish, as many as ten forms are sometimes needed to compute all the 26 case-number forms of a noun.…”
Section: The Gf Resource Grammar Librarymentioning
confidence: 99%