1999
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/1/302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of pencil kernel and depth penetration algorithms for treatment planning of proton beams

Abstract: The implementation of two algorithms for calculating dose distributions for radiation therapy treatment planning of intermediate energy proton beams is described. A pencil kernel algorithm and a depth penetration algorithm have been incorporated into a commercial three dimensional treatment planning system (Helax-TMS, Helax AB, Sweden) to allow conformal planning techniques using irregularly shaped fields, proton range modulation, range modification and dose calculation for non-coplanar beams. The pencil kerne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the range of the boron fragment is longer than the primary particle a secondary tail of È is seen. 11 B ions in a 0.6 mm diameter 12 C beam in water (solid curves). The absorbed dose of these heavy fragments is clearly influenced by rapidly increasing energy loss towards the end of their ranges, cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the range of the boron fragment is longer than the primary particle a secondary tail of È is seen. 11 B ions in a 0.6 mm diameter 12 C beam in water (solid curves). The absorbed dose of these heavy fragments is clearly influenced by rapidly increasing energy loss towards the end of their ranges, cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the simple Fokker-Plank approximation of the multiple scattering collision term of the Boltzmann equation, the first analytical solution for pencil beam transport was derived by Fermi in 1941 [3] and Eyges in 1948 [4] taking energy losses within the continuous slowing down approximation (CSDA) into account. This pencil beam solution has further been generalized to describe the lateral spread of arbitrary Gaussian beams of known initial mean square radial " r 2 ð0Þ, angular spread, " 2 ð0Þ, and covariance " r ð0Þ [5,6], of clinical electron beams in a patient during radiation therapy of malignant tumors [5][6][7][8], as well as to describe the transport of light ions in different media [9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3), as well as the nonlocal generalized highland formula computed with Eq. (6). Subsequent rows show the accuracy of both 2D scaling formalisms in reproducing each nominal curve when said curve is used as input for the calculations.…”
Section: Iiid Calculation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Conceptually similar to the convolution algorithms used in modern photon therapy treatment planning, 11,12 pencil beam algorithms model the full proton beam as a two-dimensional (2D) convolution of the proton fluence with a pencil beam dose kernel computed over surfaces normal to the proton beam's initial direction at each depth within the calculation geometry. The pencil beam kernel represents the dose distribution in water created by an elementary pencil beam of unit fluence with kinetic energy corresponding to the beam's full range, and can be calculated using various combinations of physics models and/or measured data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pTMS: plans for passive scattering were computed using the pencil-beam algorithm [24,25] of the Nucletron Helax-TMS [26,27]. Beam data were tailored to the Svederberg Laboratory (Sweden) beam line.…”
Section: Treatment-planning Systems and Beammentioning
confidence: 99%