Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevstab.13.104702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution of the Boltzmann equation for primary light ions and the transport of their fragments

Abstract: The Boltzmann equation for the transport of pencil beams of light ions in semi-infinite uniform media has been calculated. The equation is solved for the practically important generalized 3D case of Gaussian incident primary light ion beams of arbitrary mean square radius, mean square angular spread, and covariance. The transport of the associated fragments in three dimensions is derived based on the known transport of the primary particles, taking the mean square angular spread of their production processes, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis performed in Section 2.2 shows that the results by Kempe and Brahme (2010) are essentially valid. They introduced a factor ε(E), which was then assumed to be zero without further motivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis performed in Section 2.2 shows that the results by Kempe and Brahme (2010) are essentially valid. They introduced a factor ε(E), which was then assumed to be zero without further motivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Therefore, there have been attempts at deriving correction factors for the Fermi-Eyges solution to increase the accuracy of predictions. One such factor was derived by Kempe and Brahme (2010) to include absorption and energy loss in the model. However, the derivation by Kempe and Brahme was somewhat unclear mathematically and the underlying assumptions were not apparent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28]. Therefore although, the fact that, in this model we do not consider any absorption term, as given in [30,31], the bipartition model for ion transport, under continuously slowing down assumption, can in the first approximation be related to transport of a therapeutic proton beam. The bipartition model was therefore applied in a case of a therapeutic 70 MeV/u and 202 MeV/u proton beam.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…X -ray) and charged (electron and ion) particle beams are extensively used in radiation therapy both for early cancer detection and dose computations/algorithms see, e.g. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, for example, Prinja and Pomraning (1992) considered asymptotic scaling for forward-peaked transport, Börgers and Larsen (1996) derived the Fermi pencil beam equation, Asadzadeh and colleagues (2010b) studied Galerkin methods for broad beam transport, Asadzadeh and associates (2010a) extended the bipartition model for high energy electrons by Luo and Brahme (1992) to high energy ions and inhomogeneous media, and finally Kempe and Brahme (2010) studied the solution of the Boltzmann equation for light ions. In all these studies ion particles are considered to be normally incident at the boundary of a semi-infinite medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%