2016
DOI: 10.5957/josr.60.3.160012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of Linear Potential-Flow Theory in the 6DOF Coupled Simulation of Ship Collision and Grounding Accidents

Abstract: Ship collisions and groundings are highly nonlinear and transient, coupled dynamic processes involving large structural deformations and fluid structure interactions. It has long been difficult to include all effects in one simulation. By taking advantage of the user defined load subroutine and the user common subroutine, this paper implements a model of hydrodynamic loads based on linear potential-flow theory into the nonlinear finite element code LS-DYNA, facilitating a fully coupled six degrees of freedom (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation agrees with the modified Wierzbicki and Suh model in eq. (5). When B is zero, the resistance given by eq.…”
Section: Bow Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation agrees with the modified Wierzbicki and Suh model in eq. (5). When B is zero, the resistance given by eq.…”
Section: Bow Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More considerations regarding the hydrodynamic effects during ship collisions can be found in refs. [5][6][7]. The recommended deformation resistance curves for side, bow and stern impacts are given in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we do not study the collision at initial instant and the deformation of the ship, but focus on studying the movement of the FFCPS during the collision process in this paper. Compared with the traditional collision, such as the ship colliding directly with piers, walls and ground [22] etc., the duration of the collision for our case is much longer and the acceleration will be very small, therefore the added mass relevant to the acceleration against the forward speed of the ship could be omitted in the simulation. That is to say, no dynamic effect has been considered.…”
Section: Mechanical Analysis Of the Colliding Shipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu and Amdahl (2010) reformulated Stronge's 6DOF model in a local coordinate system for ship collisions, which allowed objects with three dimensional geometries and eccentricities such as icebergs to be considered. The accuracy of the external dynamics models was discussed by Tabri (2012) and Yu et al (Yu and Amdahl, 2016;Yu et al, 2016a;Yu et al, 2016b) by comparison with coupled simulations. The external dynamic models were found to be capable of predicting energy dissipation at the end of the first impact with good accuracy in general.…”
Section: Energy Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupled simulation model developed by Yu et al (Yu and Amdahl, 2016;Yu et al, 2016a;Yu et al, 2016b) is capable of capturing hydrodynamic forces, 6DOF ship motions and structural damage simultaneously but virtually does not increase computational time (the time for calculating hydrodynamic forces is negligible compared to that for structural response calculations). The ship rolled anticlockwise initially with large collision forces and bending moments and rolled back after some time under the action of the water restoring forces.…”
Section: Energy Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%