Abstract:IntroductionSystematic reviews demonstrate that advance care planning (ACP) has many positive effects for residents of aged care facilities, including decreased hospitalisation. The proposed Residential Aged Care Facility (RACF) ‘Goals of Patient Care’ (GOPC) form incorporates a resident's prior advance care plan into medical treatment orders. Where none exists, it captures residents' preferences. This documentation helps guide healthcare decisions made at times of acute clinical deterioration.Methods and anal… Show more
“…There were four GOPC categories: Goal A identifies patients without treatment limitations for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) would apply; Goal B, those for whom some treatment limitations apply, including not for attempted CPR but for intubation; Goal C, for whom investigations or treatment should only be undertaken if non-burdensome; and Goal D identifies patients who are in the terminal stage of illness for whom all interventions should be for comfort only. 12 From the total cohort of COVID-19 inpatients, we selected patients who had complete data for calculating their 4C Deterioration and DL-Poor scores (Table S1). Similar to the studies that originally validated the prediction tools, we defined inhospital clinical deterioration as initiation of ventilatory support, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) or death.…”
Background
Early recognition of severe COVID‐19 is essential for timely patient triage.
Aims
To report clinical and laboratory findings and patient outcomes at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of adult inpatients with COVID‐19 admitted to Northern Health from March to September 2020. Data were extracted from electronic medical records.
Results
Key admission data were available for 182 patients (median age 67.0 years (interquartile range, 47.9–83.1); 51.1% female). Fifty‐six (30.8%) were from residential care. One hundred and seventeen (64.3%) patients were assigned Goals of Patient Care (GOPC) A or B and 65 (35.7%) GOPC C or D. Comorbidities were present in 135 patients (74.2%). 63.2% of patients received antibiotics, 6.6% had antivirals, 45.6% received systemic glucocorticoid and 3.3% had tocilizumab. Fifty‐six (30.8%) developed clinical deterioration (24 requiring ventilation, 21 receiving critical care, 34 died). Overall, inhospital clinical deterioration was significantly associated with older age (P < 0.001), history of diabetes (P = 0.038), lower lymphocyte count (P = 0.002) and platelet count (P = 0.004), higher neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.002), elevated fibrinogen (P = 0.004), higher serum ferritin (P = 0.027) and C‐reactive protein (CRP; P = 0.002). The accuracy of the 4C Deterioration model was moderate, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68–0.90) compared with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.76–0.78) in the original validation cohort.
Conclusions
In the present study, high neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, abnormal d‐dimer, high serum CRP and ferritin appear to be useful prognostic markers.
“…There were four GOPC categories: Goal A identifies patients without treatment limitations for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) would apply; Goal B, those for whom some treatment limitations apply, including not for attempted CPR but for intubation; Goal C, for whom investigations or treatment should only be undertaken if non-burdensome; and Goal D identifies patients who are in the terminal stage of illness for whom all interventions should be for comfort only. 12 From the total cohort of COVID-19 inpatients, we selected patients who had complete data for calculating their 4C Deterioration and DL-Poor scores (Table S1). Similar to the studies that originally validated the prediction tools, we defined inhospital clinical deterioration as initiation of ventilatory support, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) or death.…”
Background
Early recognition of severe COVID‐19 is essential for timely patient triage.
Aims
To report clinical and laboratory findings and patient outcomes at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of adult inpatients with COVID‐19 admitted to Northern Health from March to September 2020. Data were extracted from electronic medical records.
Results
Key admission data were available for 182 patients (median age 67.0 years (interquartile range, 47.9–83.1); 51.1% female). Fifty‐six (30.8%) were from residential care. One hundred and seventeen (64.3%) patients were assigned Goals of Patient Care (GOPC) A or B and 65 (35.7%) GOPC C or D. Comorbidities were present in 135 patients (74.2%). 63.2% of patients received antibiotics, 6.6% had antivirals, 45.6% received systemic glucocorticoid and 3.3% had tocilizumab. Fifty‐six (30.8%) developed clinical deterioration (24 requiring ventilation, 21 receiving critical care, 34 died). Overall, inhospital clinical deterioration was significantly associated with older age (P < 0.001), history of diabetes (P = 0.038), lower lymphocyte count (P = 0.002) and platelet count (P = 0.004), higher neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.002), elevated fibrinogen (P = 0.004), higher serum ferritin (P = 0.027) and C‐reactive protein (CRP; P = 0.002). The accuracy of the 4C Deterioration model was moderate, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68–0.90) compared with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.76–0.78) in the original validation cohort.
Conclusions
In the present study, high neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, abnormal d‐dimer, high serum CRP and ferritin appear to be useful prognostic markers.
“…The training on the CIRS instrument helps clinicians to assess their patients globally, without focusing exclusively on the acute problem that is the main reason for admission. In fact, when clinical conditions deteriorate, it is almost never due to a single problem [ 32 ]. A comprehensive approach to the patient, focusing on all organs and systems, provides a more complete picture and allows for more targeted and effective care [ 33 ].…”
Delineating patients’ health profiles is essential to allow for a proper comparison between medical care and its results in patients with comorbidities. The aim of this work was to evaluate the concordance of health profiles outlined by ward doctors and by epidemiologists and the effectiveness of training interventions in improving the concordance. Between 2018 and 2021, we analyzed the concordance between the health profiles outlined by ward doctors in a private hospital and those outlined by epidemiologists on the same patients’ medical records. The checks were repeated after training interventions. The agreement test (Cohen’s kappa) was used for comparisons through STATA. The initial concordance was poor for most categories. After our project, the concordance improved for all categories of CIRS. Subsequently, we noted a decline in concordance between ward doctors and epidemiologists for CIRS, so a new training intervention was needed to improve the CIRS profile again. Initially, we found a low concordance, which increased significantly after the training interventions, proving its effectiveness.
“…Other published literature on GOC forms in Australian hospitals focuses on the use of these forms in the general hospital setting, 17 in-hospital rehabilitation 23 and a residential aged care facility. 16 Use of these forms is to provide a plan of care (including for CPR) in the event of patient deterioration, and is informed by patient wishes and advance care plans. One version 23 includes a summary of the patient's likely response to CPR and critical intervention as part of an overall summary of discussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited literature to inform GOC content. Several forms have been described, mainly taking a final summary, tick‐box approach; however, we could not find any specific to the ED setting.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.