2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2014.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a Professional Portfolio: A Tool to Demonstrate Professional Development for Advanced Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Chamblee et al. ), particularly among high performers (Hausknecht, Rodda, and Howard ). Participating in decision‐making at the organizational level is different than in patient care, but it likely has similar effects on satisfaction (Murray et al.…”
Section: Theoretical Background For Job Satisfaction and Turnover Cogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Chamblee et al. ), particularly among high performers (Hausknecht, Rodda, and Howard ). Participating in decision‐making at the organizational level is different than in patient care, but it likely has similar effects on satisfaction (Murray et al.…”
Section: Theoretical Background For Job Satisfaction and Turnover Cogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esto con el fin de observar los cambios y esfuerzos que hace el estudiante para adquirir nuevas competencias y el desarrollo a lo largo del tiempo. Todo mientras aprende y mejora las técnicas al aplicar la retroalimentación obtenida por parte del docente (Chamblee et al, 2015). Al momento de elegir el tipo de portafolio a emplear, el principal elemento a considerar debe ser el alcance deseado.…”
Section: Tipos De Portafoliosunclassified
“…Professional advancement programs for APRNs and PAs are also known as career or clinical ladders. These programs have shown to improve job satisfaction, reward professional engagement, support professional development, demonstrate a strong return on investment, and improve retention of talented staff (Arthur et al, 2020; Chamblee et al, 2015; Kapu et al, 2020; Kauffman et al, 2021; McComiskey et al, 2018; Paplanus et al, 2014; Scholtz et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%