AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020
DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-1724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a FWH approach in a high-order LES tool for aeroacoustic noise predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the far-field noise predictions, methods such as Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H), Acoustic Perturbation Equations (APE), Lighthill's analogies and Direct Noise Computation (DNC) are commonly used for predicting and mitigating the induced noise from side-view mirrors. [29][30][31][32][33] Lokhande et al 34 used the LES approach with the FW-H analogy and DNC method for evaluating acoustic and compared the numerical prediction against the experimental by Siegert et al 13 The hydrodynamic pressure fluctuations were resolved accurately up to 700 Hz with a maximum deviation of 5-10 dB, and also SPL reported was in reasonable agreement with experiments at high frequencies against the experimental results of Siegert et al 13 Rung et al 14 observed a similar deviation in the SPL level predicted by DES with the FW-H analogy. The authors point out that the deviations in the studies mentioned above were attributed to the low-resolution of the grid in the wake and larger time steps used.…”
Section: A the Generic Side View Mirrormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the far-field noise predictions, methods such as Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H), Acoustic Perturbation Equations (APE), Lighthill's analogies and Direct Noise Computation (DNC) are commonly used for predicting and mitigating the induced noise from side-view mirrors. [29][30][31][32][33] Lokhande et al 34 used the LES approach with the FW-H analogy and DNC method for evaluating acoustic and compared the numerical prediction against the experimental by Siegert et al 13 The hydrodynamic pressure fluctuations were resolved accurately up to 700 Hz with a maximum deviation of 5-10 dB, and also SPL reported was in reasonable agreement with experiments at high frequencies against the experimental results of Siegert et al 13 Rung et al 14 observed a similar deviation in the SPL level predicted by DES with the FW-H analogy. The authors point out that the deviations in the studies mentioned above were attributed to the low-resolution of the grid in the wake and larger time steps used.…”
Section: A the Generic Side View Mirrormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FWH) analogy provides the possibility of using computational aeroacoustics for most industrial applications, as it can predict the sound generated by moving surfaces, such as helicopter blades [21] or car wheels. In the particular case of the aeroacoustic noise from bluff bodies, the FWH analogy has been used either with low-Mach cases, as in the work by Cianferra et al [22], Yao et al [23] and Khalighi et al [24]; transient flows, as in the study by Cai et al [25]; or highly compressible environments (i.e., high subsonic or supersonic Mach numbers), as in the work by Alhawwary and Wang [26], Shur et al [27], Morris et al [28] and Uzun et al [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, relatively few studies to date have used the DG method, or similar high-order methods, such as the flux reconstruction method [25], to study jet noise, see e.g. [12,13,26,27]. Instead, finite volume and finite difference methods are predominantly used, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%