2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a computerized alcohol advice concept in routine emergency care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A loss of a high proportion of patients for these reasons, however, is common to other evaluations of ED-based alcohol interventions (Daeppen et al, 2007;Helmkamp et al, 2003;Neumann et al, 2006) and reflects the reach of ED-based interventions when delivered in practice (Karlsson et al, 2005;Nilsen et al, 2009;Peters et al, 1998;Trinks et al, 2010). Although the nonconsent rate of 27% poses a similar threat, it is also directly comparable with published evaluations of ED-based alcohol interventions, which have a mean nonconsent rate of 26% (Havard et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…A loss of a high proportion of patients for these reasons, however, is common to other evaluations of ED-based alcohol interventions (Daeppen et al, 2007;Helmkamp et al, 2003;Neumann et al, 2006) and reflects the reach of ED-based interventions when delivered in practice (Karlsson et al, 2005;Nilsen et al, 2009;Peters et al, 1998;Trinks et al, 2010). Although the nonconsent rate of 27% poses a similar threat, it is also directly comparable with published evaluations of ED-based alcohol interventions, which have a mean nonconsent rate of 26% (Havard et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The amount of time the researchers devoted to maintaining the intervention did not exceed 2 h/week over the 1-year study period. The implementation of the concept is described in detail in a previous study (Nilsen et al, 2009). …”
Section: Study Design Setting and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of computer-delivered interventions have generally been positive [9-13], but most randomized controlled trials have studied computer literate young people with high rates of binge drinking [14], and most reviews have concluded there is a need for further research to establish the efficacy of e-SBI in other populations and settings [9,11,13,14]. Although there is solid evidence for the acceptability of e-SBI in primary health care [15] and the emergency department [16-18], and some evidence for efficacy in these settings [19-21], there appear to be no trials testing the acceptability, feasibility, or efficacy of e-SBI in the hospital outpatient setting aside from one trial of a brief computer-delivered intervention for alcohol use limited to pregnant women attending a hospital prenatal clinic [22]. Indeed, a recent systematic review of the effectiveness of drug and alcohol interventions offered opportunistically to patients aged 16 and older (excluding pregnant women) presenting to an acute hospital outpatient setting for any reason other than specifically for alcohol or illicit drug misuse treatment did not identify any trials testing the efficacy of e-SBI [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%