Implementation of 3D printed superior mesenteric vascular models for surgical planning and/or navigation in right colectomy with extended D3 mesenterectomy: comparison of virtual and physical models to the anatomy found at surgery

Luzon, Javier A; Andersen, Bjarte Tidemann; Štimec, Bojan; Fasel, Jean; Bakka, Arne; Kazaryan, Airazat M.; Ignjatović, Dejan

doi:10.1007/s00464-018-6332-8

Cited by 37 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Luzon et al . used 3D printing to evaluate the linear dimensional differences in the anatomical landmarks of the superior mesenteric artery and vein among 3D virtual models, 3D printed models and preoperative measurements.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nine studies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] were found to be eligible for the present review, all of which were included. The studies were published between 2014 and 2018.…”

Section: Study and Patient Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The uses of 3D printing across the eight studies included are illustrated in Table 2 and can be classified into the following three categories: (1) patient education [8], (2) preoperative planning [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and (3) evaluation of response of colorectal liver metastasis to chemotherapy [16].…”

Section: Study and Patient Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of the applications of three‐dimensional printing in colorectal surgery

Emile

Wexner

2018

Colorectal Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim Three‐dimensional (3D) printing has been recognized as a revolutionary technological innovation that has benefitted numerous disciplines, including medicine. The present systematic review aimed to demonstrate the current applications of 3D printing in colorectal surgery along with the limitations and potential future applications of this innovation. Method A PRISMA‐compliant systematic literature search of studies that applied 3D printing in colorectal surgery in the period from January 1990 to July 2018 was conducted. Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched. All full‐text original articles were eligible for inclusion. Results Nine studies including 58 patients with a median age of 60.7 years were reviewed. The studies assessed 3D printing in patients with planned stoma construction, colon cancer with liver metastasis, right colon cancer, rectal cancer, intractable constipation and anal fistula. The applications of 3D printing were classified into three categories: patient education, preoperative planning and evaluation of response of colorectal liver metastasis to chemotherapy. 3D printed models aided in planning resection of colorectal liver metastasis, facilitating D3 lymphadenectomy in complete mesocolic excision, improving the understanding of pelvic anatomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer treatment, guiding electrode implantation in sacral neuromodulation for intractable constipation, and elucidating the morphology of anal fistula tract and anal sphincter muscles. Conclusion Colorectal surgery may benefit from 3D printing in enhancing patient education before stoma construction, preoperative planning and evaluation of the response of liver metastasis to chemotherapy using 3D ultrasonography.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nine studies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] were found to be eligible for the present review, all of which were included. The studies were published between 2014 and 2018.…”

Section: Study and Patient Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Systematic review of the applications of three‐dimensional printing in colorectal surgery

Emile

Wexner

2018

Colorectal Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, with rapid technological advances, surgeons must play a more active role in the assessment and implementation of new navigation systems and ensure that such innovations will meet the surgeon's (and the patient's) needs. This also entails the role to assess various 3D anatomical format, physical or virtual, which are the main ingredients of any surgical navigation system [45].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Mixed reality (MR) is being evaluated as a visual tool for surgical navigation. Current literature presents unclear results on intraoperative accuracy using the Microsoft HoloLens 1®. This study aims to assess the impact of the surgeon’s sightline in an inside-out marker-based MR navigation system for open surgery. Methods Surgeons at Akershus University Hospital tested this system. A custom-made phantom was used, containing 18 wire target crosses within its inner walls. A CT scan was obtained in order to segment all wire targets into a single 3D-model (hologram). An in-house software application (CTrue), developed for the Microsoft HoloLens 1, uploaded 3D-models and automatically registered the 3D-model with the phantom. Based on the surgeon’s sightline while registering and targeting (free sightline /F/or a strictly perpendicular sightline /P/), 4 scenarios were developed (FF-PF-FP-PP). Target error distance (TED) was obtained in three different working axes-(XYZ). Results Six surgeons (5 males, age 29–62) were enrolled. A total of 864 measurements were collected in 4 scenarios, twice. Scenario PP showed the smallest TED in XYZ-axes mean = 2.98 mm ± SD 1.33; 2.28 mm ± SD 1.45; 2.78 mm ± SD 1.91, respectively. Scenario FF showed the largest TED in XYZ-axes with mean = 10.03 mm ± SD 3.19; 6.36 mm ± SD 3.36; 16.11 mm ± SD 8.91, respectively. Multiple comparison tests, grouped in scenarios and axes, showed that the majority of scenario comparisons had significantly different TED values (p < 0.05). Y-axis always presented the smallest TED regardless of scenario tested. Conclusion A strictly perpendicular working sightline in relation to the 3D-model achieves the best accuracy results. Shortcomings in this technology, as an intraoperative visual cue, can be overcome by sightline correction. Incidentally, this is the preferred working angle for open surgery.

show abstract

“…Treatment strategies vary considerably according to anatomic location, staging, among other factors [64]. 3D printed anatomic models have shown some utility in delineating relevant surgical anatomy for resection of colorectal cancer [45,46].…”

Section: Gastrointestinalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D Printing Special Interest Group (SIG) clinical situations for which 3D printing is considered an appropriate representation or extension of data contained in a medical imaging examination: abdominal, hepatobiliary, and gastrointestinal conditions

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Medical 3D printing has demonstrated value in anatomic models for abdominal, hepatobiliary, and gastrointestinal conditions. A writing group composed of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Special Interest Group on 3D Printing (SIG) provides appropriateness criteria for abdominal, hepatobiliary, and gastrointestinal 3D printing indications. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify all relevant articles using 3D printing technology associated with a number of abdominal pathologic processes. Each included study was graded according to published guidelines. Results: Evidence-based appropriateness guidelines are provided for the following areas: intra-hepatic masses, hilar cholangiocarcinoma, biliary stenosis, biliary stones, gallbladder pathology, pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis, splenic disease, gastric pathology, small bowel pathology, colorectal cancer, perianal fistula, visceral trauma, hernia, abdominal sarcoma, abdominal wall masses, and intra-abdominal fluid collections. Conclusion: This document provides initial appropriate use criteria for medical 3D printing in abdominal, hepatobiliary, and gastrointestinal conditions.

show abstract

Implementation of 3D printed superior mesenteric vascular models for surgical planning and/or navigation in right colectomy with extended D3 mesenterectomy: comparison of virtual and physical models to the anatomy found at surgery

Cited by 37 publications

References 82 publications

Systematic review of the applications of three‐dimensional printing in colorectal surgery

Systematic review of the applications of three‐dimensional printing in colorectal surgery

Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D Printing Special Interest Group (SIG) clinical situations for which 3D printing is considered an appropriate representation or extension of data contained in a medical imaging examination: abdominal, hepatobiliary, and gastrointestinal conditions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About