2012
DOI: 10.1175/jtech-d-11-00101.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation, Characterization, and Evaluation of an Inexpensive Low-Power Low-Noise Infrasound Sensor Based on a Micromachined Differential Pressure Transducer and a Mechanical Filter

Abstract: The implementation, characterization, and evaluation of a low-cost infrasound sensor developed at the Infrasound Laboratory at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (Infra-NMT) are described. This sensor is based on a commercial micromachined piezoresistive differential pressure transducer that uses a mechanical high-pass filter to reject low-frequency outband energy. The sensor features a low-noise, 2.02-mPa rms (0.5-2 Hz), 5.47-mPa rms (0.1-20 Hz), or 5.62-mPa rms (0.05-20 Hz), flat response betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global Positioning System (GPS) time stamped pressures signals were continuously recorded with 24-bit DataCube loggers at 200 Hz. Sensors were identical micro electro-mechanical systems-based infrasonic microphone (infraBSU) characterized by a single-pole corner at 26 s. The operation and response of this type of sensor is discussed in Marcillo et al (2012). We use data from KURA station channels 1, 2, 4, and 6 because their recordings were cleanest in terms of wind noise.…”
Section: Experiments Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global Positioning System (GPS) time stamped pressures signals were continuously recorded with 24-bit DataCube loggers at 200 Hz. Sensors were identical micro electro-mechanical systems-based infrasonic microphone (infraBSU) characterized by a single-pole corner at 26 s. The operation and response of this type of sensor is discussed in Marcillo et al (2012). We use data from KURA station channels 1, 2, 4, and 6 because their recordings were cleanest in terms of wind noise.…”
Section: Experiments Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BSU sites consisted of infrasonic microphones packaged at BSU's infrasound lab, which incorporate AllSensors MEMs pressure transducers with ranges up to 1250 Pa and flat frequency response above ∼0:04 Hz. Operation and calibration of this type of microphone is discussed in Marcillo et al (2012). BSU pressure data was digitized at 200 Hz using 24-bit Omnirecs DATA-CUBE recorders.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three InfraBSU infrasound microphones were used (Marcillo et al, 2012). The balloon maintained a nominal altitude of 33 km, with occasional downward excursions of several thousand meters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%