2014
DOI: 10.1785/0220140051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to an Open Community Infrasound Dataset from the Actively Erupting Sakurajima Volcano, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(46 reference statements)
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the two largest amplitude infrasound transients (events VII and X) corresponding to medium-sized volume output events as classified both in plume digitization and in monopole source modeling. This poor scaling between Sakurajima plume height and peak pressure is also noted by Fee et al (2014;this Focus Section) and has been generally observed for explosions at other volcanoes, such as at Tungurahua (Ecuador; Johnson et al, 2005).…”
Section: Comparison Of Infrasound-inferred Volume Growth and Time-lapmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, the two largest amplitude infrasound transients (events VII and X) corresponding to medium-sized volume output events as classified both in plume digitization and in monopole source modeling. This poor scaling between Sakurajima plume height and peak pressure is also noted by Fee et al (2014;this Focus Section) and has been generally observed for explosions at other volcanoes, such as at Tungurahua (Ecuador; Johnson et al, 2005).…”
Section: Comparison Of Infrasound-inferred Volume Growth and Time-lapmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It is notable, however, that some of the sensors deployed by other teams at Sakurajima varied in their response and/or had an approximate ∼0:1 Hz high-pass filter applied during routine processing (see fig. 2 of Fee et al, 2014;this Focus Section). Records from these sensors would require proper signal reconstitution prior to quantification of flux and or volume flux measurements.…”
Section: Instrument Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations