2005
DOI: 10.2514/1.4009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and Validation of the Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence Model in Parallel Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The (∇¯ ) 2 term can cause numerical problems for implicit solvers [15]; hence, the diffusion term is rearranged using the following identity:…”
Section: Spalart-allmaras Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (∇¯ ) 2 term can cause numerical problems for implicit solvers [15]; hence, the diffusion term is rearranged using the following identity:…”
Section: Spalart-allmaras Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High performance of NES was systematically demonstrated by testing it a wide range of aerodynamic configurations of different complexity: from one-element 2D airfoils through transporttype supercritical wings up to full wing-body configurations [11,12,18]. The results by the code NES demonstrated a high accuracy of drag prediction (within several counts) in the whole range of flight conditions.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The code ensures high accuracy of the Navier-Stokes computations and high robustness for a wide range of flows and geometrical configurations. The high performance of NES was systematically demonstrated by testing it in a wide range of aerodynamic configurations of different complexity: from one-element 2D airfoils through transporttype supercritical wings and ARA M100 wing-body geometry [11] to wing-body-nacelle-pylon DLR-F6 aircraft configuration [12].…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OPTIMAS optimizations conducted here cost about three orders-ofmagnitude more than an objective-function evaluation. For more information on OPTIMAS and NES, see References [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Optimization and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%