2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2007.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiconstrained aerodynamic design of business jet by CFD driven optimization tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Применяемый нами принципиально новый подход [12][13][14] к учету нелинейных ограничений можно очертить следующим образом.…”
Section: математическая постановка задачиunclassified
“…Применяемый нами принципиально новый подход [12][13][14] к учету нелинейных ограничений можно очертить следующим образом.…”
Section: математическая постановка задачиunclassified
“…Peigin et al. 8 performed the aerodynamic shape design optimisation for business jet using CFD tool. The 3D flexible wings are also designed by implementing the high fidelity analysis and optimisation techniques to provide more reliable wing shape results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Chiba et al 7 implemented the RANS solver and Nastran for the coupled aero-structural wing shape design to enhance the wing configuration results. Peigin et al 8 performed the aerodynamic shape design optimisation for business jet using CFD tool. The 3D flexible wings are also designed by implementing the high fidelity analysis and optimisation techniques to provide more reliable wing shape results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFD-driven optimization has been explored by several researchers [1][2][3]. Peigin et al has proposed a design tool that implements multi-constrained optimization of shape design driven by Genetic Algorithms (GA) coupled with CFD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit to GA is that they can handle a large number (20+) of design variables; however, with a large number of constraints, GA are computationally expensive. Peigin et al reports [15][16][17][18] hours for a single point optimization and on average 8-12 optimization steps [1]. A similar multi-constrained optimization strategy has been implemented on a ship's hull.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%