Implementation, Adoption, and Perceptions of Telemental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review (Preprint)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Early in 2020, mental health services had to rapidly shift from face-to-face models of care to delivering the majority of treatments remotely (by video or phone call or occasionally messaging) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted in several challenges for staff and patients, but also in benefits such as convenience or increased access for people with impaired mobility or in rural areas. There is a need to understand the extent and impacts of telemental health implementation, and barriers and facilitators to its effective and acceptable use. This is relevant both to future emergency adoption of telemental health and to debates on its future use in routine mental health care. OBJECTIVE To investigate the adoption and impacts of telemental health approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic, and facilitators and barriers to optimal implementation. METHODS Four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science) were searched for primary research relating to remote working, mental health care, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Preprint servers were also searched. Results of studies were synthesized using framework synthesis. RESULTS A total of 77 papers met our inclusion criteria. In most studies, the majority of contacts could be transferred to a remote form during the pandemic, and good acceptability to service users and clinicians tended to be reported, at least where the alternative to remote contacts was interrupting care. However, a range of impediments to dealing optimal care by this means were also identified. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of telemental health allowed some continuing support to the majority of service users during the COVID-19 pandemic and has value in an emergency situation. However, not all service users can be reached by this means, and better evidence is now needed on long-term impacts on therapeutic relationships and quality of care, and on impacts on groups at risk of digital exclusion and how to mitigate these. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews CRD42021211025; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021211025

Development and Validation of the Telepsychology Facilitators Scale: A National Study

“…Supportive infrastructure (or lack thereof) also played an important role in telepsychology use during the COVID-19 pandemic (see Appleton et al, 2021 for a review).…”

“…Some psychologists continued to hold perceptions that telepsychology diminished the quality and/or effectiveness of care and had concerns about its negative impact on the therapeutic alliance (Watson et al, 2023). Conversely, the increased use of telepsychology during the COVID-19 pandemic was facilitated by the rapid development and implementation of organizational infrastructure (e.g., telepsychology platforms, telehealth coordinators) and training for telepsychology use, in addition to the relaxation of legal policies and billing reimbursements, that occurred in response to "stay at home" orders (Appleton et al, 2021).…”

A case study of virtually delivered emotion‐focused family therapy

“…Consequently, the effectiveness of various therapeutic modalities, including family therapies, has not yet been adequately established, and the supply of telehealth-ready clinicians cannot meet the growing demand (Smith et al, 2020). At the height of COVID-19, however, most child and family mental health services pivoted to virtual service delivery (Appleton et al, 2021;Racine et al, 2020) and intend to maintain their virtual practice postpandemic (McKee et al, 2022). The present study aims to address this gap in the context of student-led virtually delivered emotion-focused family therapy (EFFT; Foroughe, 2018;Lafrance et al, 2020).…”

The impact of digital interventions on medication adherence in paediatric populations with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, and/or anxiety: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis

“…12 Finally, telemental health is defined as the delivery of strictly mental health care services using ICTs such as video conferencing telephone, email or text messaging. 13 Medication adherence is defined as "the extent to which the patient's action matches the agreed recommendations", i.e., the recommendations by the health care provider. 14 Intentional nonadherence is a lack of willingness from patients to take their medication, arising from personal preferences and attitudes, while nonintentional nonadherence is due to medication barriers such as difficulties in accessing treatment or failing to take ownership due to age or cognitive impairments.…”