2023
DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study of virtually delivered emotion‐focused family therapy

Abstract: Clinical psychologists and therapists are increasingly taking advantage of internet and mobile‐based technologies to deliver mental health services for individuals and groups since the COVID‐19 pandemic. However, there is a dearth of research evaluating the appropriateness of virtual platforms for family interventions. Further, no research has examined the effectiveness of weekly emotion‐focused family therapy (EFFT). This case study presents a virtually delivered 8‐week EFFT intervention, which supported care… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another strength of this study is that the size of this evaluation is larger than many in the existing literature and includes a wide range of outcomes, assessed using standardized and validated measures to assess caregiver outcomes and their children’s mental health needs. It provides a baseline against which to compare EFFT workshops that were delivered remotely during and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic, as has been recommended and examined by EFFT practitioners and researchers (Foroughe et al, 2022; Smith et al, 2023). The limitations of this study are the lack of a preregistered protocol, control group or randomized design, the absence of follow-up assessments beyond the end of the 2-day workshop, and the exclusive use of caregiver self-report measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strength of this study is that the size of this evaluation is larger than many in the existing literature and includes a wide range of outcomes, assessed using standardized and validated measures to assess caregiver outcomes and their children’s mental health needs. It provides a baseline against which to compare EFFT workshops that were delivered remotely during and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic, as has been recommended and examined by EFFT practitioners and researchers (Foroughe et al, 2022; Smith et al, 2023). The limitations of this study are the lack of a preregistered protocol, control group or randomized design, the absence of follow-up assessments beyond the end of the 2-day workshop, and the exclusive use of caregiver self-report measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%