IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN MENTERI KOMUNIKASI DAN INFORMATIKA NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2014 DALAM PENANGANAN SITUS INTERNET BERMUATAN NEGATIF (Studi Kasus Pemblokiran terhadap Situs Radikal oleh Kemenkominfo Tahun 2015)

Abstract

<p><em>At the end of March 2015 the Ministry of Communications and Informatics (Kemenkominfo) blocking 22 internet sites that are considered radically charged or sympathizers of radicalism. Kemenkominfo serves to keep sites that campaignradicalism can be minimized. This authority is contained in the "Regulation of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology Number 19 Year 2014. About Handling Negatively Lacked Websites". Under the regulations, Kemenkominfo is authorized to block or normalize sites that are negatively charged. Related to that, the researcher examines the implementation of "Regulation of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology Number 19 Year 2014. he blocking measures are analyzed using relevant regulations from the legal normative side of juridical, and analyzed using capital policy implementation theory of Van Meter and Van Horn. Obtained result of research that in doing the blocking, mechanism which apply not fully executed by Kemenkominfo. Kemenkominfo put the BNPT report in urgency, so Kemenkominfo directly asked internet service providers to block sites.</em></p><p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>Pada akhir Maret 2015 Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika (Kemenkominfo) melakukan pemblokiran terhadap 22 situs internet yang dinilai bermuatan radikal atau simpatisan radikalisme. Kemenkominfo berfungsi menjaga agar situs-situs yang mengampanyekan radikalisme dapat diminimalisir. Kewenangan ini tertuang dalam Peraturan Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 19 Tahun 2014. Tentang Penanganan Situs Internet Bermuatan Negatif‖. Dalam peraturan tersebut dijelaskan, Kemenkominfo berwenang untuk melakukan pemblokiran atau normalisasi terhadap situs yang bermuatan negatif. Terkait hal tersebut, peneliti mengkaji implementasi ―Peraturan Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 19 Tahun 2014. Pemblokiran tersebut dianalisis menggunakan peraturan terkait dari sisi mekanisme normatif yuridis, dan dianalisis menggunakan teori implementasi kebijakan modal Van Meter dan Van Horn. Diperoleh hasil penelitian bahwa dalam melakukan pemblokiran, mekanisme yang berlaku tidak sepenuhnya dijalankan oleh Kemenkominfo. Kemenkominfo menempatkan laporan BNPT dalam keadaan mendesak, sehingga Kemenkominfo langsung meminta penyedia layanan internet untuk memblokir situs-situs.</p>

Inequality of Sexual Violence Reporting in Online Media during the New Normal Era: A Feminist Perspective

“…The high motive for exploitation also indicates that the media is involved as a subject in carrying out structural violence against women. Violence is a form of gender injustice caused by an imbalance of societal power (Musyafak, 2015;Fakih, 2020) . The media indirectly contributes to continuing other violent reporting practices through written narratives.…”

Internet Blocking Policy in Indonesia: Between Realities, Pros and Cons?

“…The Ministry of Communication and Informatics does not assess the sites that are requested to be blocked, whether they are radical sites or not as stated by BNPT. The assessment of these sites is entirely entrusted to the assessment of BNPT [13]. This certainly raises back the pros and cons of the people over-blocking sites that are considered radical.…”

“…At the end of March 2015, at the request of the National Counterterrorism Agency (BNPT), the Ministry of Communication and Informatics (Kemenkominfo) blocked several internet sites calling for Islamic da'wah which was considered to be radically charged. They are said to be Islamic da'wah sitesbecause of their names; these sites use names or attributes related to Islam [2]. In 2015, the government blocked 766,395 negative sites.…”