2018
DOI: 10.30862/jm.v2i1.788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementasi Apraisal Dalam Evaluasi Bahasa: Sebuah Ancangan Wacana Forensik

Abstract: <div class="WordSection1"><p>The aim of this research are (1) describing language evaluation on students’ article on attitude (2) describing language evaluation on students’ article on engagement (3) describing language evaluation on students’ article on graduation. The research method used in this research is descriptive qualitative that is done by concordance method analysis and distribution by using a software of Simple Concordance Program (SCP). The data for this research is an article text wri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results include: (1) the average score of the initial test y was 61.29 and the final test was 77.76, or there was an increase by 16.47; (2) the calculation obtained t ratio of 8.22 and t table of 2.02 at 5% significance level, or t ratio was higher than t table (8.22> 2.02); and (3) the decision making model is shown to be effective in learning how to write persuasive paragraph. Basically, the present study has similarity with Wardhani [4] regarding the description of Bahasa Indonesia in the persuasive discourse of public appeal, Panggabean and Lestari [5] on the discourse of forensic perspective, and Awalludin [6] on persuasive discourse. However, some dissimilarities are apparent.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results include: (1) the average score of the initial test y was 61.29 and the final test was 77.76, or there was an increase by 16.47; (2) the calculation obtained t ratio of 8.22 and t table of 2.02 at 5% significance level, or t ratio was higher than t table (8.22> 2.02); and (3) the decision making model is shown to be effective in learning how to write persuasive paragraph. Basically, the present study has similarity with Wardhani [4] regarding the description of Bahasa Indonesia in the persuasive discourse of public appeal, Panggabean and Lestari [5] on the discourse of forensic perspective, and Awalludin [6] on persuasive discourse. However, some dissimilarities are apparent.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 68%
“…However, some dissimilarities are apparent. The present study differs from Wardhani [4] on the discussion of the symbolic deixis in persuasive discourse, Panggabean and Lestari [5] on the association of persuasive discourse and forensic linguistics, and Awalludin [6] on the discussion of persuasive discourse related to symbolic deixis. The object of the present study is also distinctive to previous studies, namely the persuasive discourse in current slangs or jargons on road signs.…”
Section: Related Workcontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the research only focused on novel (Dewi, 2015), state political speech (Sukma, 2018;Alvionita, 2018;Rohmawati, 2016), advertisment text (Yunus, 2018;Nugraheni, 2011;Tiani, 2017), information media on tourism (Suryaningtyas, 2018), application of appraisal in teaching (Mustadi, 2010) language evaluation (Panggabean & Lestari, 2018) and online media. Research on the appraisal system particularly in online media has also been carried out by several researchers, such as Nur & Hadi (2017), Pusparini, A., Djatmika & Santosa (2017), Nazhira, R., Sinar, S & Suriyadi, S. (2016), and Ellyawati (2016).…”
Section: Chart 1: Appraisal System (Martin and White 2005)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication researchers including Phanthaphoommee (2023), Septiana (2021), and Yahiaoui et al (2021) have also utilized this analytical framework to examine nuances in interpersonal and ideological meaning. Additional contributions have stemmed from education, with appraisal-focused investigations by Kabel (2021), McKinley (2018), Panggabean and Lestari (2018), and Zolfaghari (2023) exploring pedagogical applications and implications. Linguistic appraisal research represents another thriving domain, as evidenced by recent studies from Hsu (2021), Juwit and Jaya (2022), and Parameswari and Jaya (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%