Implants for orthodontic anchorage

Zheng, Xiaowen; Sun, Yannan; Zhang, Yimei; Cai, Ting; Sun, Feng; Jun, Lin

doi:10.1097/md.0000000000010232

Cited by 17 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, in many cases, the successful orthodontic treatment depends on controlling orthodontic anchorage, but conventional orthodontic anchorage may not always achieve such results. Some of its limitations are the patient-dependency for headgear use, the great compression on the mucosa caused by the Nance button, and the lack of sufficient strength from the transpalatal bar 12,13 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Osseointegrated implant as an auxiliary of orthodontic leveling in case of asymmetric vertical skeletal discrepancy – case report

Bernardini¹,

Claudino²,

Pereira³

2019

Rev. da Fac. de Odontologia, UPF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this work is to present a case report where an osteointegrated implant was used as skeletal anchorage unit in association with fixed orthodontic appliance in the treatment of an adult patient with vertical asymmetrical skeletal discrepancy. In this case report, the pre-existing osseointegrated implant in the region of element 21 was used as an aid of skeletal anchorage for the leveling of the upper occlusal plane by means of the straight-wire technique, Capelozza standard I slot .022 ", using the sequence of arches of nickel-titanium thermo-activated .014 ", .016", .017 "X.025" and .019X.025 ", followed by the steel arch .019" X.025". The results presented in this report demonstrated the osteointegrated implant as a good option, when used as anchorage resource to help orthodontics, providing better conditions of comfort and esthetics, as well as simplifying the technique.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Osseointegrated implant as an auxiliary of orthodontic leveling in case of asymmetric vertical skeletal discrepancy – case report

Bernardini¹,

Claudino²,

Pereira³

2019

Rev. da Fac. de Odontologia, UPF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The use of miniscrew implants (MIs) controls the movement of teeth in the mesial, distal, and vertical directions, without the need for additional anchorage. 3 Also depending upon the are of insertion implants can be defined as -…”

Section: Miniscrewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implants in orthodontics: A brief review

Sheoran¹,

Kumar²,

Kumar³

et al. 2021

IJODR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Orthodontic mini-implants (OMI) are the most effective tool for reinforcement of orthodontic anchorage [ 1 ]. This temporary anchorage device has become popular among orthodontists, being considered a versatile, well-tolerated, low-invasive, simple to insert ad low-cost method.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of low-level laser therapy on the orthodontic mini-implants stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the orthodontic mini-implants (OMI) stability. Materials and methods An unrestricted electronic database search in PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov and a hand search were performed up to December 2020. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or non-randomized clinical trials (Non-RCTs) that assessed the effects of LLLT on the OMI stability were included. Data regarding the general information, LLLT characteristics, and outcomes were extracted. The authors performed risk of bias assessment with Cochrane Collaboration’s or ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis was also conducted. Results Five RCTs and one Non-RCT were included and 108 patients were evaluated. The LLLT characteristics presented different wavelength, power, energy density, irradiation time, and protocol duration. Five RCTs had a low risk of selection bias. Two RCTs had a low risk of performance and detection bias. All RCTs had a low risk of attrition bias, reporting bias and other bias. The Non-RCT presented a low risk of bias for all criteria, except for the bias in selection of participants. The meta-analysis revealed that LLLT significantly increased the OMI stability (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.67) and the highest clinical benefit was showed after 1 (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.75), 2 (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.21), and 3 (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.51) months of OMI placement. Conclusions LLLT shows positive effects on the OMI stability.

show abstract

Implants for orthodontic anchorage

Cited by 17 publications

References 24 publications

Osseointegrated implant as an auxiliary of orthodontic leveling in case of asymmetric vertical skeletal discrepancy – case report

Osseointegrated implant as an auxiliary of orthodontic leveling in case of asymmetric vertical skeletal discrepancy – case report

Implants in orthodontics: A brief review

Effects of low-level laser therapy on the orthodontic mini-implants stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About