1994
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(94)95343-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implanted dopant and associated damage profiles in kiloelectronvolt 19F+ implanted LiNbO3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig.2 show the example of the impurity depth profile, which is restored by Pearson IV statistical distribution using the spatial moments calculated by RANGE code. The good agreement with experimental data [15] and with the corresponding Monte-Carlo simulation by means ofthe TRIRS code [16] is observed. The depth profile of energy deposition (due to elastic collisions in atomic displacements cascade) can also be restored by means ofPearson IV distribution using the spatial moments calculated by RANGE code.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig.2 show the example of the impurity depth profile, which is restored by Pearson IV statistical distribution using the spatial moments calculated by RANGE code. The good agreement with experimental data [15] and with the corresponding Monte-Carlo simulation by means ofthe TRIRS code [16] is observed. The depth profile of energy deposition (due to elastic collisions in atomic displacements cascade) can also be restored by means ofPearson IV distribution using the spatial moments calculated by RANGE code.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…As an example, we can see in Fig.3 (a, b) the depth profiles of radiation damages (created by implantation ofLiNbO3 polyatomic target) both experimental and calculated. As seen from this picture the RANGE calculations are in good agreement both with the experimental data [15,17] and with MC calculations which are performed by TRIRS code [16]. squares -experimental data [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation