2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2011.00700.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant-Retained Removable Partial Dentures: An 8-Year Retrospective Study

Abstract: Implant-retained RPDs are a reliable intermediate solution that can reduce biological and economic costs while maintaining implant treatment benefits and the ease of RPD procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[3] In this case report, Kennedy Class 1 partial edentulousness was changed to an implant-bounded Kennedy Class 3 configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[3] In this case report, Kennedy Class 1 partial edentulousness was changed to an implant-bounded Kennedy Class 3 configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[134] Previous results suggest that by placing an implant to the distal extension site of the RPD, enhancement of distribution of the occlusal forces, movement of the posterior rotational axis to a distal position, shortening of the distal extension of the RPD, and reducing potential rotational movement of the RPD can be improved. [315] The tissueward and the opposite movement of the RPD were restricted by the method mentioned above, and as a result, retention and stability of the RPD are increased. At the recall appointments, the patient did not report any complaint about the movement of the implant-supported RPD when compared to his previous conventional clasp-retained RPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…31 The patient wished to be able to receive dental implants on the maxillary edentulous area if her future medical and economic conditions allowed; the benefits of implant support for the extension base partial removable dental prosthesis had been emphasized in the course of treatment. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] Thus, a remake of the maxillary metal framework was necessary and the distorted metal framework was used only for an altered cast impression and acquiring the maxillomandibular relationship record. The distal surface of the maxillary left canine in the definitive cast was removed, and the corresponding proximal plate was thinned (Fig.…”
Section: Clincal Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A su vez el uso de implantes en la extensión distal reduce la carga sobre la articulación temporomandibular, además al ser ubicados en la región del segundo molar, el centro de fuerza oclusal sería similar al de una próte-sis fija implantosoportada (Bortolini et al, 2011).…”
Section: Arellano-valeria M J; Olivares-keller D and Flores M Aunclassified