Implant rehabilitation in patients with oral lichen planus: an overview

Petruzzi, Massimo; Benedittis, M. De; Cortelazzi, R; Milillo, Lucio; Lucchese, Alberta; Serpico, Rosario; Grassi, Felice Roberto

doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0695-3

Cited by 16 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This opinion is confirmed by other systematic reviews [70,71]. In a case of OLP implants should be positioned only if mucosal signs and symptoms are in the remission phase.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 68%

General Diseases Influence on Peri-Implantitis Development: a Systematic Review

Guobis¹,

Pacauskienė²,

Astramskaitė

2016

JOMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo systematically review the influence of systemic diseases or medications used in their treatment on the dental implant therapy success.Material and MethodsThe search strategy was implemented on the National Library of Medicine database (MEDLINE) (Ovid) and EMBASE electronic databases between January 2006 and January 2016. Human studies with available English articles analysing the relationship between dental implant therapy success and systemic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, AIDS/HIV, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, Crohn’s disease, cardiovascular diseases, scleroderma, Sjögren’s syndrome, lichen planus, ectodermal dysplasia, post-transplantation status, were included in present review according to the PRISMA guidelines. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO system with the code CRD42016033662.ResultsPresent review included forty one retrospective and prospective follow-up studies, case-control studies, case report series and cohort studies. Despite some limitations this study reveals positive results of implantation in most systemic conditions that should be interpreted with caution. Influence of cardiovascular diseases on the dental implantation success should be explored deeply, because of controversial results and likelihood of comorbidity expressed by a history of cardiovascular diseases and periodontitis. There is only a weak relationship with bone density in osteoporosis and implant failure. All the other diseases did not show significant effect on implantation success.ConclusionsRecent studies with low strength of evidence and controversy show that systemic diseases may have potential effect on the success of implantation, but further detailed studies are needed to provide these findings.

show abstract

“…This opinion is confirmed by other systematic reviews [70,71]. In a case of OLP implants should be positioned only if mucosal signs and symptoms are in the remission phase.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 68%

General Diseases Influence on Peri-Implantitis Development: a Systematic Review

Guobis¹,

Pacauskienė²,

Astramskaitė

2016

JOMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The basal cells (Target cells) undergo apoptosis due to the action of CD8 cytotoxic T cells . Since cytokines are involved in the pathogenesis of OLP and play a major role in bone resorption, this may lead to bone loss at the implant site, eventually leading to implant failure (Figs ). The current study patient selection was according to the correlation of the histopathological and clinical picture.…”

mentioning

confidence: 69%

“…LP patients treated with dental implants are at a risk of implant failure due to inability of the epithelium to attach to the implant surface, which allows the bacteria to access the preimplant tissue, leading to failure of osseointegration . It has also been recommended that lichen planus patients be handled with care during the remission phase …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Management Protocol for Dental Implants Inserted in Patients with Active Lichen Planus. Part II 4‐Year Follow‐Up

Khamis

Aboushelib

Helal

2018

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To evaluate marginal bone loss (MBL) of dental implants inserted in active lichen planus patients. Materials and Methods:The study included 59 subjects divided into 3 groups depending on their lichen planus diagnosis and administration of a low dose of corticosteroids: 17 healthy individuals, 20 controlled lichen planus patients controlled using low doses of systemic corticosteroids, and 22 noncontrolled lichen planus patients. During 4-year follow-up sessions MBL was evaluated, and biopsies were collected from lichen planus patients and examined. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data (α = 0.05).

show abstract

“…Au contraire, les auteurs rapportent que, en diminuant les frottements (d'une prothèse amovible par exemple) au niveau d'une zone de muqueuse atteinte, les implants pourraient s'avérer bénéfiques au contrôle de l'activité de la maladie [26].…”

Section: Implants Et Lichen Plan Buccalunclassified

“…Au total, en colligeant l'ensemble des données de la litté-rature à leur disposition, les auteurs rapportaient un taux de survie implantaire de 94,8 % sur 56,5 mois en moyenne [26].…”

Section: Implants Et Lichen Plan Buccalunclassified

Implantologie et pathologies de la muqueuse buccale : une revue de la littérature

Moreau

Renoux

Ejeil

2015

Med Buccale Chir Buccale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Résumé -Introduction : L'essor de l'implantologie au cours des dernières années a conduit à une augmentation du champ de ses indications, repoussant notamment les contre-indications liées aux terrains pathologiques des patients. Cet article propose une revue de la littérature et une mise au point sur l'implantologie dans un contexte de pathologies de la muqueuse buccale. Méthodologie : À partir d'une recherche bibliographique sur la base de données MEDLINE sans limite de période, les articles traitant de l'implantologie chez des patients atteints de pathologies de la muqueuse buccale ont été étudiés. Résultats : L'implantologie chez ces patients a été peu décrite. Les données de cette revue de la littérature tendent à mettre en évidence un apport indéniable de la mise en place d'implants chez les patients atteints de pathologies de la muqueuse buccale. Discussion : Historiquement considérées comme des contre-indications à la pose d'implants, ces pathologies ne doivent plus aujourd'hui être considérées comme un frein à une réhabilitation prothétique implanto-portée. Conclusion : Toutefois, une maintenance et une hygiène rigoureuses doit être instaurée afin de contrôler les implants et l'éventuelle réactivation de la pathologie.Abstract -Implantology and oral mucosal lesions: a literature review. Introduction: Recent developments in implantology have led to an extension of its indications, especially regarding special care patients. This paper offers a review of the literature on the subject of implantology in cases of oral mucosal lesions. Methods: A review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, without a date range, searching for articles describing oral implant treatments in patients with oral mucosal alterations. Results: Few cases of oral implant treatments in such patients are described. The results of the literature review showed that oral implant treatments greatly enhance the quality of life of these patients. Discussion: Although these pathologies used to be considered contraindications to dental implant placement, recent data shows the feasibility of such treatments. Conclusion: Nonetheless, both strict oral hygiene and regular maintenance are essential to intercept any potential pathology reactivation.

show abstract

Implant rehabilitation in patients with oral lichen planus: an overview

Cited by 16 publications

References 22 publications

General Diseases Influence on Peri-Implantitis Development: a Systematic Review

General Diseases Influence on Peri-Implantitis Development: a Systematic Review

Clinical Management Protocol for Dental Implants Inserted in Patients with Active Lichen Planus. Part II 4‐Year Follow‐Up

Implantologie et pathologies de la muqueuse buccale : une revue de la littérature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About