2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant rates of cardiac implantable electrical devices in Europe: A systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive empirical evidence shows that access to different types of medical technologies varies across countries and within countries (Willeme & Dumont, ; Bech et al ., ). Large differences in implant rates have been documented for cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) despite their established and internationally recognized efficacy for the management of arrhythmias (Valzania et al ., ). Studies of trends in CIED implants have shown rates consistently rising over time in virtually all countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extensive empirical evidence shows that access to different types of medical technologies varies across countries and within countries (Willeme & Dumont, ; Bech et al ., ). Large differences in implant rates have been documented for cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) despite their established and internationally recognized efficacy for the management of arrhythmias (Valzania et al ., ). Studies of trends in CIED implants have shown rates consistently rising over time in virtually all countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies of trends in CIED implants have shown rates consistently rising over time in virtually all countries. However, these rising trends have not brought implant rates in various countries to similar levels, but quite contrarily, the differences have persisted and, in some cases, even increased (Arribas et al ., ; Valzania et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Through the analysis of national/local guidelines and data from registries and administrative databases, rates of utilization were mapped to provide evidence of different degrees of access within member states, and whether this adoption is in line with the existing evidence on clinical and cost effectiveness. Valzania et al () reported a systematic review of the literature on implant rates for cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) in Europe. They found that there had been a recent rise in implant rates, with large geographic differences.…”
Section: Geographical Variation In the Use Of Medical Devices In The Eumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective electrical treatment for selected patients with heart failure and wide QRS interval that, following the pioneering experiences performed in France around 20 years ago, obtained full development and clinical validation, moving from a compassionate treatment used in a few cases as a ‘last resort’ option, to a treatment tested and validated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), both in the setting of moderate–severe heart failure and of mild heart failure with reduced ejection fraction . The implementation of CRT across Europe is variable, fluctuating considerably in implant rates within and across countries, as a result of the influence of different types of health care systems, as well as of different economic, demographic and cultural contexts …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%