Investigating Regional Variation of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Device Implant Rates in European Healthcare Systems: What Drives Differences?

Abstract

Despite established efficacy for cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs), large differences in CIED implant rates have been documented across and within countries. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of socio-economic, epidemiological and supply side factors on CIED implant rates across 57 Regions in 5 EU countries and to assess the feasibility of using administrative data for this purpose. A total of 1 330 098 hospitalizations for CIED procedures extracted from hospital discharge databases in Austria, England, Germany, Italy and Slovenia from 2008 to 2012 was used in the analysis. Higher levels of tertiary education among the labour force and percent of aged population are positively associated with implant rates of CIED. Regional per capita GDP and number of implanting centres appear to have no significant effect. Institutional factors are shown to be important for the diffusion of CIED. Wide variation in CIED implant rates across and within five EU countries is undeniable. However, regional factors play a limited part in explaining these differences with few exceptions. Administrative databases are a valuable source of data for investigating the diffusion of medical technologies, while the choice of appropriate modelling strategy is crucial in identifying the drivers for variation across countries.

Long‐term follow‐up of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients with regard to appropriate therapy, complications, and mortality

“…Moreover, the programming may affect the occurrence of ICD therapy . The ICD implantation rate is lower in Sweden than in many comparable countries, which should be kept in mind when applying these findings to different contexts . While offering validated real‐world data, this is a smaller study, which increases the risk of type 2 errors.…”

A scoping review of core outcome sets and their ‘mapping’ onto real-world data using prostate cancer as a case study

“…However, using predefined algorithms to measure metastases and secondary tumours in administrative data alone has proven challenging elsewhere and should therefore be tested [38]. The reliability and completeness of coding for symptoms and treatment effects in administrative data can be sub-optimal, given marked variability in number and detail of diagnostic and procedure codes in administrative data, as has been found in multi-country projects [39][40][41]. Specific codes may be identified for some outcomes, but whether they are routinely recorded in hospital discharge summaries needs evaluation.…”

Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project

“…Therefore, in a subsequent phase of the research, reported in the third paper in this supplement, Torbica et al () undertook a new study of implant rates, the first to use the national hospital discharge datasets available in 5 EU countries. They provide evidence on differences in use of medical devices within and between member states, investigate the determinants of differences in access to CIEDs and assess the potential and limitations of administrative databases for the analysis of utilization rates of medical devices in electrophysiology.…”