2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant Migration in Cervical Disk Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most researches reported favorable clinical outcomes and confirmed the success of its core idea — protecting the adjacent segment. However, complications related to instability including subsidence, migration and dislocation are still commonly seen clinically, with an reported occurrence rate of 3–10%, 8.2–10.9% and 0.5–3.06% [ 17 20 ], respectively. Such complications inhibit the recovery of symptoms after surgery and may lead to an ending of re-operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most researches reported favorable clinical outcomes and confirmed the success of its core idea — protecting the adjacent segment. However, complications related to instability including subsidence, migration and dislocation are still commonly seen clinically, with an reported occurrence rate of 3–10%, 8.2–10.9% and 0.5–3.06% [ 17 20 ], respectively. Such complications inhibit the recovery of symptoms after surgery and may lead to an ending of re-operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest report of symptomatic migrations comprised 5 patients who underwent single or multiple-level CDA in a single institution, with an overall rate of 0.4% of all cervical arthroplasties performed. 40 In four cases, the device was explanted and revised with ACDF and in one patient, the implant was simply removed. Zhai reported a case of migration in a two-level arthroplasty that presented with dysphagia and was revised with a corpectomy of the middle vertebra and multilevel fusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found an NDI success rate of 83.6%, which was also comparable to the NDI success rate of 86.1% [ 5 ] and 87.0% [ 6 ] in the two FDA studies. The reported incidence of prosthesis dislocation after CDA varied from 3.1 to 19.6% [ 9 , 16 , 17 ]. No serious adverse events including prosthesis dislocation or failure were occurred in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%