Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000000860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant Material, Type of Fixation at the Shaft, and Position of Plate Modify Biomechanics of Distal Femur Plate Osteosynthesis

Abstract: Using the same plate design, the study showed that implant material, screw type, and position of the plate affect the construct stiffness and fatigue life of the fixation construct. With this knowledge, the surgeon can decide the optimal construct based on a given fracture pattern, bone strength, and reduction quality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Creating appropriate fracture site strain environments conducive to bone healing in comminuted distal femoral fractures can be difficult and relies on many factors, including plate length, screw and plate characteristics, and fracture morphology 1 . The ideal diaphyseal screw type, working length, and construct configuration for distal femoral locking plates remain unknown despite ample literature on the biomechanical properties of distal femoral plate constructs varying in plate material, plate and working lengths, diaphyseal screw type used, and plate distance from bone 1‐21 . Many surgeons advocate for long plate constructs when using nonlocking or locking screws in the diaphysis in an attempt to distribute strain over a greater working length and avoid condensing the strain at the fracture site 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creating appropriate fracture site strain environments conducive to bone healing in comminuted distal femoral fractures can be difficult and relies on many factors, including plate length, screw and plate characteristics, and fracture morphology 1 . The ideal diaphyseal screw type, working length, and construct configuration for distal femoral locking plates remain unknown despite ample literature on the biomechanical properties of distal femoral plate constructs varying in plate material, plate and working lengths, diaphyseal screw type used, and plate distance from bone 1‐21 . Many surgeons advocate for long plate constructs when using nonlocking or locking screws in the diaphysis in an attempt to distribute strain over a greater working length and avoid condensing the strain at the fracture site 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, excessive interfragmentary motion may lead to the hypertrophy-induced nonunion of a fracture, and too little interfragmentary motion may cause bone atrophy [ 11 ]. Although the ideal stiffness and motion cannot be determined, overall structural stiffness can be modified by choosing different implants, screw types, and positions of the screw or plate [ 12 , 13 ]. When the stability is too high (in other words, the strain is too low), it may result in nonunion [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As anyone might expect, a significant clinical disappointment situation in regular plating is screw disappointment because of screw slackening or haul out (Fig. 2) [10] . The strength of crack obsession in traditional plating can be additionally upgraded if the break closes are packed.…”
Section: Customary Platingmentioning
confidence: 99%