2021
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imperfect spoiling in variable flip angle T1 mapping at 7T: Quantifying and minimizing impact

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(56 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural MRI data were processed for each participant using the hMRI toolbox (Tabelow et al, 2019) within SPM12. The default toolbox configuration settings were used, with the exception that correction for imperfect spoiling was additionally enabled (Corbin and Callaghan, 2021). The output MT saturation map, used as the anatomically faithful structural image, quantified the degree of saturation of the steady state signal induced by the application of the off-resonance pre-pulse, having accounted for spatially varying T1 times and RF field inhomogeneity (Helms et al, 2008; Weiskopf et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural MRI data were processed for each participant using the hMRI toolbox (Tabelow et al, 2019) within SPM12. The default toolbox configuration settings were used, with the exception that correction for imperfect spoiling was additionally enabled (Corbin and Callaghan, 2021). The output MT saturation map, used as the anatomically faithful structural image, quantified the degree of saturation of the steady state signal induced by the application of the off-resonance pre-pulse, having accounted for spatially varying T1 times and RF field inhomogeneity (Helms et al, 2008; Weiskopf et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural MRI data were processed for each participant using the hMRI toolbox (Tabelow et al, 2019) within SPM12. The default toolbox configuration settings were used, with the exception that correction for imperfect spoiling was additionally enabled (Corbin and Callaghan, 2021). The output MT saturation map, used as the anatomically faithful structural image, quantified the degree of saturation of the steady state signal induced by the application of the off-resonance prepulse, having accounted for spatially varying T 1 times and RF field inhomogeneity (Helms et al, 2008;Weiskopf et al, 2013).…”
Section: Structural Mri Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recommended for the preprocessing stream, we used highly accurate and precise RF transmit field maps with a total error of less than 3% (Lutti et al, 2010(Lutti et al, , 2012 and corrected for imperfect RF spoiling. The previous effects lead to deviations from the Ernst signal equation underlying the R1 estimation and imprecisions in their correction may thus lead to inaccuracies (Corbin & Callaghan, 2021;Yarnykh, 2010). For example, even small deviations of 3% in the RF transmit field mapping can cause errors of up to 6% in the R1 maps due to the quadratic dependence of the estimated R1 on the local flip angle (Weiskopf et al, 2011).…”
Section: Potential Causes Of Variations In Parameter Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%