2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1224649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imperative and Elective Indications for Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Tumors: Long-Term Oncological Follow-Up

Abstract: NSS can be performed with oncologically safe and good functional results in imperative indications. In elective indications the resectability of a tumour rather than size and location is the limiting factor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is most likely an issue of inadequate power due to the low event count. It is also possible that the incidence of ESKD after partial nephrectomy was biased due to unmeasured confounding by indication, where patients undergoing partial nephrectomy with an absolute indication (e.g., patients with a single functional kidney, preexisting severe CKD, or bilateral tumors) were at higher risk of ESKD than those undergoing elective partial nephrectomy (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is most likely an issue of inadequate power due to the low event count. It is also possible that the incidence of ESKD after partial nephrectomy was biased due to unmeasured confounding by indication, where patients undergoing partial nephrectomy with an absolute indication (e.g., patients with a single functional kidney, preexisting severe CKD, or bilateral tumors) were at higher risk of ESKD than those undergoing elective partial nephrectomy (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%