2017
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i28/97642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impedance Matching Techniques for Microstrip Patch Antenna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Transmission line model is first used for determining the dimensions of the patches for the antennas of 5.4, 3.6, and 2.45 GHz. Then microstrip feed line of the 5.4 GHz antenna is determined based on quarter wavelength transformer given in Reference . The conducting layers of copper for 5.4, 3.6, and 2.45 GHz antenna patches are appropriately concatenated by leaving a 1 mm gap for the placement of additional circuit elements used for combination of two patches as well as for impedance matching.…”
Section: The Proposed Reconfigurable Antenna Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transmission line model is first used for determining the dimensions of the patches for the antennas of 5.4, 3.6, and 2.45 GHz. Then microstrip feed line of the 5.4 GHz antenna is determined based on quarter wavelength transformer given in Reference . The conducting layers of copper for 5.4, 3.6, and 2.45 GHz antenna patches are appropriately concatenated by leaving a 1 mm gap for the placement of additional circuit elements used for combination of two patches as well as for impedance matching.…”
Section: The Proposed Reconfigurable Antenna Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the Z a value is calculated by using feed line length ( d f ), wavelength ( λ ) of 3.6 GHz antenna, microstrip feed line impedance ( Z 0 ) of 5.4 GHz antenna and 50 Ω input impedance. Then, the patch length of 3.6 GHz antenna ( d 2 ) is put into Equation together with the Z a value and this equation is solved for W 2 . Finally, a new Z a value is calculated for this patch from Equation , and again Equation is used for determining W 3 . Zin()dnormalf=Z0[]Znormala+italicjZ0tan2πλdnormalfZ0+italicjZnormalatan2πλdnormalf Za=90εnormalr2εr1dW2 where d is length of the antenna, W is width of the antenna.…”
Section: The Proposed Reconfigurable Antenna Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We select a patch antenna, as this is a low profile and low cost antenna with a directive radiation pattern that can easily be integrated in the handle of a cooking pot. Impedance matching for microstrip patch antennas is discussed in [39]. We first simulate the antenna via finite difference time domain (FDTD) simulations in Sim4Life and optimise the antenna characteristics such as the radiation pattern and S 11 scattering parameter near the metallic pot.…”
Section: Narrowband Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated reconfigurable antenna which provides multiple selectable features meets the above said requirement. In [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], some design schemes are available in which two antennas are integrated on a solitary substrate to optimize the space utilization. In these reported schemes, small antennas are incorporated in huge sized UWB radiator either by reutilization of large printed area of UWB antenna as ground plane for the second antenna [4][5][6][7][8][9] or by placing the small sized antenna in electrically neutral area of UWB antenna [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these designs are good and solve the problem of underutilization of large printed area of UWB antenna. However in all reported designs, the numbers of reconfigurable features are confined to either frequency reconfiguration or NB-WB reconfiguration [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, single reconfiguration feature is not sufficient for future communication devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%