2011
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2010.2090088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impedance Adapting Compensation for Low-Power Multistage Amplifiers

Abstract: A power-efficient frequency compensation topology, Impedance Adapting Compensation (IAC), is presented in this paper. This IAC topology has, on one hand, a normal Miller capacitor, which is still needed to provide an internal negative feedback loop, and on the other hand, a serial RC impedance as a load to the intermediate stage, improving performance parameters such as stability, gain-bandwidth product and power dissipation.A three-stage IAC amplifier was implemented and fabricated in a 0.35 m CMOS technology… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15, both the 3-step and 4-step NCM amplifiers achieve comparable , and break the limit of largedrivability. Before we apply any dynamic-biasing SR-enhancement technique [28], [29], the of the 4-step NCM amplifier is still 2.2 higher than [22], but 1.2 , 1.47 , 5.8 and 9.79 lower than [24]- [27], respectively. [26] and [27] have better owing to the added SR helper and aggressively scaled compensation capacitors, respectively, whereas both have a limited -drivability range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15, both the 3-step and 4-step NCM amplifiers achieve comparable , and break the limit of largedrivability. Before we apply any dynamic-biasing SR-enhancement technique [28], [29], the of the 4-step NCM amplifier is still 2.2 higher than [22], but 1.2 , 1.47 , 5.8 and 9.79 lower than [24]- [27], respectively. [26] and [27] have better owing to the added SR helper and aggressively scaled compensation capacitors, respectively, whereas both have a limited -drivability range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unlike the multi-stage amplifiers, no bulky passives are entailed in our single-stage solutions. To allow a fair comparison with recent three-stage amplifiers [22]- [27], two figuresof-merit (FOMs) [5] that account for the impact of both power and area: and , are introduced. As summarized in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Table 5-9 also suggests that the RNIC requires lower power compared to NMCNR, for the same target design specifications. The commonly used small-signal FoM, FoM S [105], indicates the superior performance of the RNIC technique. …”
Section: Nmcnr Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LHP zero generated by the transconductance g mf1 , is used to cancel the negative phase shift of the first non-dominant pole. Since this cancelation takes place beyond the unity gain frequency, its effect on the settling time is marginal [16]. The targeted pole-zero distributions are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Architectures Of the Proposed Amplifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, some advanced techniques use active feedbacks to create high speed paths and improve the bandwidth [1,[8][9][10]14]. In order to further enhance the gain-bandwidth product, other techniques such as multipath NMC (MNMC) [15], impedance adapting compensation (IAC) [16], and no capacitor feedforward (NCFF) [17], generate left half plane (LHP) zeros and perform pole-zero cancelations. The pole elimination improves the phase response and sufficient phase margin is possible with larger unity gain frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%