Impacts of Violent Crime and Neighborhood Structure on Trusting Your Neighbors

Abstract

The current work investigated impacts of local violent crime rates on residents' willingness to trust neighbors. Crime has been thought to "atomize" community. Many works have considered impacts of crime on local social climate or vice versa. A smaller number of works have linked crime with general judgments about trustworthiness, but there has been little work on crime and trust of neighbors. 2002 survey data of 4,133 Philadelphia residents in 45 neighborhoods were combined with census and reported crime data to address this question. Multilevel, multinomial logit models confirmed that residents' willingness to trust their neighbors varied significantly across neighborhoods for two response category contrasts: strongly agreeing or agreeing neighbors were trustworthy, each relative to strongly disagreeing. As expected, residents in neighborhoods with higher crime rates judged their neighbors as less dependable, even after controlling for local participation. Neighborhood crime and status impacts both depended on the contrast considered and on how status and crime were disentangled. Results align with some earlier works showing contingent effects of crime on ties, or contingent effects of ties on crime. Results extend earlier works by simultaneously focusing on one critical and central assessment of neighbors, showing important differences across response categories, and simultaneously finding extraneighborhood impacts.

A Data Mining Approach for Examining Predictors of Physical Activity Among Urban Older Adults

“…Standardized self-report measures included anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System ([PROMIS] (Pilkonis et al, 2011); health information seeking behaviors from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) (National Cancer Institute, 2007); Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) (Radloff, 1977); Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983); Neighborhood Trust and Cohesion (NTC) (Garcia, Taylor, & Lawton, 2007); Newest Vital Sign (NVS) for health literacy (Weiss et al, 2005); and Patient Heath Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9 depression) (Spitzer, Kroenke, & Williams, 1999). For more details on the measures related to the 925 initial variables see (online supplement table 1).…”

An Integrated Contextual Model of Confidence in Local Police

“…Although such arguments seem plausible, a simpler less abstract one also has been proposed. In more cohesive communities, which are also often higher SES communities (Garcia, Taylor & Lawton, 2007), locally engaged residents view community matters similarly; this allows local police to develop quicker and clearer understandings of citizens' priorities; thus, police can be quickly responsive in such communities (Taylor, 2001, pp. 303-362).…”

Violent Crime, Residential Instability and Mobility: Does the Relationship Differ in Minority Neighborhoods?

“…Most commonly, residential stability is measured either as the average residential length of stay in the neighborhood, the proportion of households who moved within the past 5 years (of the Census), the proportion of residents who own their home, or some combination of these measures as an index (Garcia et al 2007). There are two main dimensions underlying these measures.…”